Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2013 Lessons Learned"

Revision as of 09:53, 29 May 2013

Sponsorship

This year we had a "supporter" sponsorship level, which was aimed at those companies who would not want a stand, but would want some minor branding on the website and at the event. This was very popular and we'd recommend it to future organisers.

Website

A submission notification should be provided within the service for submitting abstract, workshop, etc. An automatic reply mail would do the trick. We did have a section on the web page leading to the submission section that said people wouldn't receive confirmation, but either they missed this or wanted to check anyway, so it ended up causing more work.

Publicity

We've used Lanyrd to publicise the event alongside the "usual" channels, and also Eventbrite for dealing with the free hackathon registration.

Paper Selection Methodology

The OSGeo community is very passionate about openness, so the methodology needs to be made as explicit and open as possible. Where additional filtering on top of the community vote is required (which it invariably is) then this needs to be explained clearly in the wiki. There probably ought to be an established methodology for doing this, which should be recorded in the FOSS4G Cookbook.

Previous Years Lessons Learned

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 We've used Lanyrd to publicise the event alongside the "usual" channels, and also Eventbrite for dealing with the free hackathon registration.
+==Paper Selection Methodology==
+The OSGeo community is very passionate about openness, so the methodology needs to be made as explicit and open as possible. Where additional filtering on top of the community vote is required (which it invariably is) then this needs to be explained clearly in the wiki. There probably ought to be an established methodology for doing this, which should be recorded in the [[FOSS4G Cookbook]].
 == Previous Years Lessons Learned  ==