Difference between revisions of "GeoTools Provenance Review"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
You can find status, including IP status, from this page here: | You can find status, including IP status, from this page here: | ||
| − | + | * [http://geotools.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Modules Modules] | |
A couple of modules have already encountered issues, mostly those working with closed source systems, or dependencies on closed source jars. | A couple of modules have already encountered issues, mostly those working with closed source systems, or dependencies on closed source jars. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
This is the RnD page for the documentation project: | This is the RnD page for the documentation project: | ||
| − | + | * [http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Fix+the+Docs Fix the Docs] | |
Revision as of 13:20, 24 April 2006
Nothing to see here - why? Because the work is being done on a module by module basis, and the results posted to the geotools wiki.
You can find status, including IP status, from this page here:
A couple of modules have already encountered issues, mostly those working with closed source systems, or dependencies on closed source jars.
The GeoTools team has also set there own goal to "fix the docs" into a consistent state before "graduating" from this process. Expressed more clearly the library should be in a state that you coudl "write a book" on it.
This is the RnD page for the documentation project: