GitInfrastructureComparison

From OSGeo
Revision as of 03:15, 14 April 2016 by Strk (talk | contribs) (Ported comparison table)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Comparison Table

Moved from https://git.osgeo.org/_gogs_/sac/gogs-service/wiki/Git-services-comparison

This table is aimed at helping to decide which service to install on OSGeo machines to provide hosting for OSGeo projects.

The priority column could be used to give a score of each feature, but it's not clear currently how we should determine score (a poll?)

deployed in staging YES NO
login via LDAP YES YES
LDAP groups sync NO
private repositories YES (no filesystem permission handling) YES
external issue tracker YES (example) YES
internal issue tracker YES YES
tool to migrate from trac NO YES
external wiki YES
internal wiki YES (edit permissions match code repo ones) YES
organization management YES (poor) YES
comment issues via mail NO YES
PostgreSQL backend YES YES
Multilanguage 15 languages
Comments on diff lines NO YES
Pull requests YES YES
Webhooks YES YES
Edit GIT hooks YES
CI external (like drone) integrated
tracking of forks YES (example)

More about existing software packages

GitLab

"You will be running Sidekiq, Unicorn, Nginx, Ruby (plus all its gems) and then Gitlab itself."


GOGS

https://gogs.io/ http://jbrodriguez.io/gogs-an-alternative-to-gitlab/


Github.com

default

Kallithea

https://kallithea-scm.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kallithea_%28software%29


cgit

gitbucket - JVM

gitblit - JVM

Phabricator + Diffusion

twentyafterfour from wikimieda-labs:

our phabricator accepts ldap logins plus oauth; phabricator might still be a decent way of managing your repositories. It's essentially the same thing as gitolite but with a lot more automation around account management, key management and hooks... you have to deal with account management yourself, phabricator integrates all of that into one package (which can still be somewhat automated / integrated with other tools)


gitolite

twentyafterfour from wikimieda-labs: likely doesn't support LDAP; certainly a lot lighter weight than Phab stack, if you are comfortable with perl and don't mind doing a bit of integration work


mutante on Wikimedia-devtools says:

we currently use Gerrit for code review (gerrit.wikimedia.org) and gitblit for git.wikimedia.org. Things are being migrated to phabricator.wikimedia.org though (Diffusion). You are in the right channel you can git clone all of our server configs btw. it's a puppet repo and all public. you might also be interested in wikitech.wikimedia.org, our labs environment where you can get free virtual machines to test things

Apache Allura


Other Links


Other Backend Sites

Please contact the infrastructure-dev@apache.org mailing list if you have comments or suggestions regarding this service.

git.osgeo.org

 https://git.osgeo.org/_gogs_/explore/repos



General Attributes


Implementation Language License Resource Usage


Common Features


Dashboard & File Browser Issue Tracking, Milestones & Commit keywords Organizations support Wiki Code Review GIST Web Hooks


Feature Comparison


login via LDAP private repositories external issue tracker internal issue tracker tool to migrate from trac external wiki internal wiki organization management comment issues via mail PostgreSQL backend Multilanguage Comments on diff lines Pull requests Webhooks CL tracking of forks