Difference between revisions of "Talk:Service Provider Directory"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: It would be helpful to have options under the 'Technology Expertise' list for 'Geospatial Servers' and 'Systems Administration'. It SEEMS these important services are in keeping with the ...)
 
(New section: Ordering)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
* Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.
 
* Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.
 +
 +
== Ordering ==
 +
 +
Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does.

Revision as of 10:44, 30 January 2008

It would be helpful to have options under the 'Technology Expertise' list for 'Geospatial Servers' and 'Systems Administration'. It SEEMS these important services are in keeping with the goals of the directory.--Dougrenwick 19:27, 28 June 2007 (CEST).

  • This should be addressed by the additional section "type of service provided"
  • Perhaps a list of service types (e.g. end user application development, by language vs. data development vs. hosting vs. feature development) would help further differentiate providers. Change from "perhaps" to "must". I don't want to waste mine or anyone else's time turning down queries I'm not able or willing to provide.
  • Add coordinates to a searchable map. Add colored symbols to represent different service types, size of symbol reflects level of sponsorship or project involvement. This will need to be addressed carefully by good cartographic layout.

Ordering

Languages should be ordered alphabetically. Ideally using the original language like the OSGeo web site does.