Difference between revisions of "Teaching Material Evaluation Criteria"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Wiki-JoWalsh (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
# Software covered in the course is under an OSI approved license | # Software covered in the course is under an OSI approved license | ||
| − | # Material and data are available under an open content license (cf [http://def.okfn.org/ Open Knowledge Definition] | + | # Material and data are available under an open content license (cf [http://def.okfn.org/ Open Knowledge Definition]) |
# The material has been reviewed and admired by at least 2 people on the Edu committee | # The material has been reviewed and admired by at least 2 people on the Edu committee | ||
| − | + | # Tutorial comes with metadata identifying author, date, length/timespan, audience type | |
== Desirable == | == Desirable == | ||
# At least software from one OSGeo Software project is used | # At least software from one OSGeo Software project is used | ||
Revision as of 01:39, 28 August 2006
This is a thought experiment
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to outline the criteria to be used for endorsing teaching material developed by OSGeo members and offered through the OSGeo site.
Criteria
Required
- Software covered in the course is under an OSI approved license
- Material and data are available under an open content license (cf Open Knowledge Definition)
- The material has been reviewed and admired by at least 2 people on the Edu committee
- Tutorial comes with metadata identifying author, date, length/timespan, audience type
Desirable
- At least software from one OSGeo Software project is used