Difference between revisions of "Membership Process 2016"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (cosmetics) |
(→Nominations: removed duplicate point.) |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
# The CRO should verify with the nominee that they are willing to stand for the election. This should include an explanation of charter memership responsibilities. Once confirmed, the CRO should forward the nomination to the OSGeo discuss list. No seconder is required. | # The CRO should verify with the nominee that they are willing to stand for the election. This should include an explanation of charter memership responsibilities. Once confirmed, the CRO should forward the nomination to the OSGeo discuss list. No seconder is required. | ||
# All OSGeo members (members as well as charter members) are encouraged to discuss candidates on the discuss list. | # All OSGeo members (members as well as charter members) are encouraged to discuss candidates on the discuss list. | ||
− | |||
# Once all the nominations close, a summary of charter candidates will be prepared and posted by the CRO to the OSGeo discuss list. | # Once all the nominations close, a summary of charter candidates will be prepared and posted by the CRO to the OSGeo discuss list. | ||
Revision as of 13:26, 15 March 2007
This is a preliminary proposal for a membership process, and has not been approved.
See Potential Nominees for Next Membership Election for new proposed members.
General Process
Each year fifteen additional charter members are nominated and elected by the OSGeo charter members, in a process operated by the Chief Returning Officer (CRO).
Nominations
- The nominations period should be roughly 1 week, and should be announced by the CRO on the OSGeo announce and discuss lists.
- Nominations for charter membership should be sent to the CRO (at cro@osgeo.org).
- Anyone who is not already a charter member is a potential nominee.
- The CRO should verify with the nominee that they are willing to stand for the election. This should include an explanation of charter memership responsibilities. Once confirmed, the CRO should forward the nomination to the OSGeo discuss list. No seconder is required.
- All OSGeo members (members as well as charter members) are encouraged to discuss candidates on the discuss list.
- Once all the nominations close, a summary of charter candidates will be prepared and posted by the CRO to the OSGeo discuss list.
Voting
- Voting occurs roughly one week after nominations close.
- The CRO should ensure that all charter members receive the voting announcement - the OSGeo Secretary can provide a charter member list with contact info.
- Each charter member will have 15 votes.
- All votes will be sent to cro@osgeo.org, which is archived and forwarded to the CRO for counting.
- Charter members may apply all their votes to a single person or distribute them in integral amounts over multiple candidates.
- The voting period is roughly 1 week long.
- Once complete the CRO tallies votes and the 15 new charter membership are assigned to the candidates with the most votes.
- In case of a vote tie, the CRO will use some suitable random method to select from the tied candidates to fill the new positions.
- The CRO will announce the selected charter members on discuss@lists.osgeo.org, update the official list with the Secretary, and update the web site.
Charter Membership Criteria
Previously suggested (but unofficial) membership selection criteria include:
- The person should have made a contribution to free and open source geospatial software already.
- The person should be willing to put in time and effort on the foundation, perhaps joining committee(s), or volunteering in some other way that gets the foundation going.
- Members should believe in the general goals of the foundation. To support and promote the use of free and open source geospatial software in a collaborative manner.
- Members selected should provide a diversity of geographic representation in the foundation.
- Members selected should provide representation of a diversity of projects. For instance, we have a strong desire to see the "Java tribe" well represented in the foundation. We don't want the membership dominated by folks from just one project.
- Members selected should provide representation of a diversity of interests (e.g., corporate, hobbyist, educational, scientific).
- Members should be prepared to work constructively and positively towards the goals of the foundation. Good teamwork skills are an asset.