Difference between revisions of "Geodata Committee Tenth Meeting"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (draft agenda)
 
m
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
  Chair: Jo Walsh  
 
  Chair: Jo Walsh  
 
   IRC: [irc://irc.freenode.net/osgeo #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org] (or via [http://irc.telascience.org Web based IRC client])
 
   IRC: [irc://irc.freenode.net/osgeo #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org] (or via [http://irc.telascience.org Web based IRC client])
   Date: 2006-December-15 (at least in the Americas and Europe)
+
   Date: 2006-December-14 (at least in the Americas and Europe)
   Time: 1600 GMT / 1100 East Coast / 1700 Europe ([http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=11&day=02&year=2006&hour=16&min=0&sec=0 fixed time])
+
   Time: 1600 GMT / 1100 East Coast / 1700 Europe ([http://timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=12&day=14&year=2006&hour=16&min=0&sec=0 fixed time])
  
 
== Agenda ==
 
== Agenda ==
  
 
* Update on GeoNetwork installation at telascience, what are next steps  
 
* Update on GeoNetwork installation at telascience, what are next steps  
 +
** http://geodata.telascience.org:8080/geonetwork/srv/en/main.home
 +
* State of play @ Telascience
 +
** Which servers and other resources are available or in use?
 +
** State of currently hosted data sets: BMNG, VMap0, ?
 +
** Plans for future data sets: LandSat, ?
 
** does everyone who wants access know where to look
 
** does everyone who wants access know where to look
 
* Update on geometadata generation utilities
 
* Update on geometadata generation utilities
 +
** http://project.knowledgeforge.net/geometa/trac/
 
* How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required
 
* How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required
 +
:: ''<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but ''
 +
:: ''build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine ''
 +
:: ''what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers ''
 +
:: ''are appropriate for those''
 
* Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
 
* Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
 +
** Extracting something specification-like from [[Geodata Metadata Requirements]]
 +
** Implementations
 +
* We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated
 +
 +
[[Category:Public Geospatial Data Committee]]

Latest revision as of 07:34, 23 August 2007

Metadata

Chair: Jo Walsh 
 IRC: #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org (or via Web based IRC client)
 Date: 2006-December-14 (at least in the Americas and Europe)
 Time: 1600 GMT / 1100 East Coast / 1700 Europe (fixed time)

Agenda

<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but
build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine
what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers
are appropriate for those
  • Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
  • We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated