Difference between revisions of "MapServer incubation status"

Revision as of 10:05, 25 January 2008

Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?: Yes, selected for "founding project" incubation by the OSGeo board.

Has an Incubation committee member been assigned as Mentor?: Yes, Chris Holmes has been assigned as MapServer incubation mentor.

Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?: Yes, to a point. There is a basic page that points to our primary, plone-based, website.

Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?: Yes, we migrated to the OSGeo TRAC instance in late April 2007.

Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?: No. mailing lists are hosted at http://lists.umn.edu/ and we would like to move to OSGeo hosted lists at some point soon.

Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?: Yes, we migrated from CVS to the OSGeo SVN instance in early May 2007.

Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?: Yes, source downloads (nightly and official releases)were moved to OSGeo in early May 2007.

Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?: The mapserver-users mailing list is quite active and well posed questions often result in more than one helpful response.

Are source and binary downloads for the package available?: Yes, visit http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/

Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?: Yes, the RFC transitioning our technical steering committee (TSC) to the PSC passed in April 2007. PSC membership is now complete.

Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.: Yes, see RFC's (for PSC, and committer rules at least). May need to review committer rules in light of tighter OSGeo policy.

How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?: Yes, approximately 15 committers are established from 10 or more organizations. See detailed list.

Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?: If not, indicate when this will occur.

Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?: If not, indicate what is planned. (note: currently an OSGeo web style has not bee established)

Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?: The code provenance review has begun and a roster of siginificant developers has been built and is available via the MapServer website. We are using an online spreadsheet as to tool to track the review, presence of a license, etc... for each source file in the MapServer distribution.

Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?: indicate outstanding issues.

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 ; Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
-: Yes, the RFC transitioning our technical steering committee (TSC) to the PSC passed in April 2007. We are now working to fill out the PSC.
+: Yes, the RFC transitioning our technical steering committee (TSC) to the PSC passed in April 2007. [http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/development/rfc/ms-rfc-23 PSC membership is now complete].
 ; Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.