Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
m (Reverted edit of Wwwzhudan, changed back to last version by Tmitchell) |
(updated first page layout proposal) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | For an updated first page '''layout''', see here: http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/New_OSGeo_Wiki_Startpage | ||
+ | |||
+ | -- Markus [[User:Neteler|Neteler]] 14:45, 20 June 2008 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
How do we refer to geospatial free and open source software in this wiki? Does "OSGeo software" mean the foundation projects or is it a general term? If it refers to only the foundation projects, how do we then refer to this software in general? | How do we refer to geospatial free and open source software in this wiki? Does "OSGeo software" mean the foundation projects or is it a general term? If it refers to only the foundation projects, how do we then refer to this software in general? | ||
Revision as of 10:45, 20 June 2008
For an updated first page layout, see here: http://grass.osgeo.org/wiki/New_OSGeo_Wiki_Startpage
-- Markus Neteler 14:45, 20 June 2008 (EDT)
How do we refer to geospatial free and open source software in this wiki? Does "OSGeo software" mean the foundation projects or is it a general term? If it refers to only the foundation projects, how do we then refer to this software in general?
I propose having separate pages for committees and their projects. There should be direct links to these pages on the main page. I have the same opinion about the www.osgeo.org pages, now I seem to have to click several times to get to committee/project pages.
Ari, I wouldn't be offended if you moved the committee list page into this main page as a subsection. I'm not sure of a "quick" way of referring to open source geospatial software. "OSGeo software" certainly leaves some uncertainty as to whether it refers to only foundation projects or more generally.
--Warmerda 22:20, 26 March 2006 (CEST)
I moved the events link from here and put it under promo&visibility page, where there is another link to another events page. (Maybe some merging is needed)
I suggest that we clean up this main page and use better titles. The current ones are not very descriptive.
--AJolma 8 August 2006 (CEST)