Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2010 Lessons Learned"
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
*avoid mass e-mailing to potential sponsors. | *avoid mass e-mailing to potential sponsors. | ||
* prepare one-to-one e-mails to justify their involvement and offer support even to download a manual that's so easy to do. Let them feel comfortable. | * prepare one-to-one e-mails to justify their involvement and offer support even to download a manual that's so easy to do. Let them feel comfortable. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==abstract selection== | ||
| + | *We have received way more abstracts that what expected. 360 for 120 places. | ||
| + | *coupling the selection of the Academic Committee and the Community Review is a tough job. We where 4 people during a long day together and we had to review our choices for the three days after from home. | ||
| + | *Using a Google Spreadsheet has been really a good help. The chat included helps to let the LOC group to refine the selection but I would not use it instead of a face to face meeting. | ||
| + | * suggestions: after the first selection, it's a good practice to leave 3-4 slots free to give the time to the community to react and help you choosing from the discarded presentations. There's always a good presentation that the LOC can miss and that can be added in a second moment. | ||
==add other lesson== | ==add other lesson== | ||
Revision as of 00:09, 10 June 2010
back to FOSS4G 2010
communication inside the organization
every LOC is different and it's not easy to establish the connection between OSGeo Board, the Conf Com and the LOC. It's curious how, even if we all want to help each others, it's so easy to get into misunderstandings. The Chair has a key role to make this process smoother and bridge between these groups.
suggestion: don't sub-estimate the difficulties that can arise from the LOC and the OSGeo communities. Keep supporting an open minded approach.
web platform
public website
The home page of the conference and all the contents to show to the public can be easily made in pure HTML (little php can help). Check other events websites.
abstracts platform
this can be the real PITA. As far we've seen there's not yet a good open source platform for this and the one from our conference company is nice to see but not even sufficient in terms of bugs, usability, features.
So double check your opportunities, you can avoid recursive heart attacks.
Academic track submission
- definitely also collect keywords
Sponsors
- don't wait for sponsors knocking at your door.
- avoid mass e-mailing to potential sponsors.
- prepare one-to-one e-mails to justify their involvement and offer support even to download a manual that's so easy to do. Let them feel comfortable.
abstract selection
- We have received way more abstracts that what expected. 360 for 120 places.
- coupling the selection of the Academic Committee and the Community Review is a tough job. We where 4 people during a long day together and we had to review our choices for the three days after from home.
- Using a Google Spreadsheet has been really a good help. The chat included helps to let the LOC group to refine the selection but I would not use it instead of a face to face meeting.
- suggestions: after the first selection, it's a good practice to leave 3-4 slots free to give the time to the community to react and help you choosing from the discarded presentations. There's always a good presentation that the LOC can miss and that can be added in a second moment.
add other lesson
...