Difference between revisions of "FunCom Meeting 3"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Minutes: add post-meeting email motion.) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
− | * Approve minutes for [[ | + | * Approve minutes for [[FunCom_Meeting_2|Second Meeting]]. |
* Discuss [[Project Sponsorship]] proposal, and possibly approve. | * Discuss [[Project Sponsorship]] proposal, and possibly approve. | ||
* Discuss [[Foundation Sponsorship]] proposal, and possibly approve. | * Discuss [[Foundation Sponsorship]] proposal, and possibly approve. | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Minutes = | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Approved [[FunCom_Meeting_2|Second Meeting]] minutes. | ||
+ | * Reviewed [[Project Sponsorship]] proposal. Reaction supportive. Suggestions included: | ||
+ | # Making "Past Sponsors" optional. | ||
+ | # Dropping "Past Sponsors" off the list after two years. | ||
+ | # Give a name for sponsors less than Silver (perhaps Associate or Friend of project). | ||
+ | # Possibly just use paypal donations for small contributions. | ||
+ | # Clarify that much of the fundraising bookkeeping could be done by the ED or a bookkeeper rather than the Treasurer directly. | ||
+ | # Need to clarify the value add of OSGeo to project sponsorship. Financial transparency, etc | ||
+ | # Should we reduce or remove OSGeo overhead on "earmarked sponsorships"? Decided not to for now. | ||
+ | # Possibly realign level names, and cutoffs with the foundation sponsorships. | ||
+ | # Apply OSGeo overhead portion of sponsorships towards OSGeo foundation sponsorships. | ||
+ | # We need to run this past the projects for review before approving. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Reviewed [[Foundation Sponsorship]]. Suggestions included: | ||
+ | # Earmarking ... decided it was better to handle this as project sponsorships. | ||
+ | # Make sure some sort of sponsor visibility on the OSGeo main page (perhaps a rotating logo/link?) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * The committee passed a motion approving the [[Foundation Sponsorship]] proposal, and forwarding to the board of directors for approval, with the intent to implement post-haste. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Agreed to meeting against next week to roll out foundation sponsorship, and possibly approve project sponsorship. | ||
+ | * Meeting closed. | ||
+ | * Motion to adopt [[Project Sponsorship]] proposal passed by email vote (closing 25th October, 2006). |
Latest revision as of 17:43, 25 October 2006
Time
Proposed date: Tuesday Aug 29nd. 2006
Proposed time: 1600 UTC (noon EST, 9:00am PST)
Proposed location: IRC channel #osgeo
Agenda
- Approve minutes for Second Meeting.
- Discuss Project Sponsorship proposal, and possibly approve.
- Discuss Foundation Sponsorship proposal, and possibly approve.
Minutes
- Approved Second Meeting minutes.
- Reviewed Project Sponsorship proposal. Reaction supportive. Suggestions included:
- Making "Past Sponsors" optional.
- Dropping "Past Sponsors" off the list after two years.
- Give a name for sponsors less than Silver (perhaps Associate or Friend of project).
- Possibly just use paypal donations for small contributions.
- Clarify that much of the fundraising bookkeeping could be done by the ED or a bookkeeper rather than the Treasurer directly.
- Need to clarify the value add of OSGeo to project sponsorship. Financial transparency, etc
- Should we reduce or remove OSGeo overhead on "earmarked sponsorships"? Decided not to for now.
- Possibly realign level names, and cutoffs with the foundation sponsorships.
- Apply OSGeo overhead portion of sponsorships towards OSGeo foundation sponsorships.
- We need to run this past the projects for review before approving.
- Reviewed Foundation Sponsorship. Suggestions included:
- Earmarking ... decided it was better to handle this as project sponsorships.
- Make sure some sort of sponsor visibility on the OSGeo main page (perhaps a rotating logo/link?)
- The committee passed a motion approving the Foundation Sponsorship proposal, and forwarding to the board of directors for approval, with the intent to implement post-haste.
- Agreed to meeting against next week to roll out foundation sponsorship, and possibly approve project sponsorship.
- Meeting closed.
- Motion to adopt Project Sponsorship proposal passed by email vote (closing 25th October, 2006).