Difference between revisions of "Paris Code Sprint 2016 : Feedback"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
[[User:Tigerfoot|Tigerfoot]] ([[User talk:Tigerfoot|talk]]) 19:30, 27 February 2016 (PST) - Perfect organization and great place. My report [https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint/ here]
 
[[User:Tigerfoot|Tigerfoot]] ([[User talk:Tigerfoot|talk]]) 19:30, 27 February 2016 (PST) - Perfect organization and great place. My report [https://lizards.opensuse.org/2016/02/27/tosprint-or-not-to-sprint/ here]
 +
 +
Giuseppe Broccolo: http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/brin-postgis-codesprint2016-paris/
 +
 +
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html
  
 
== What should be kept for a next edition ? ==
 
== What should be kept for a next edition ? ==
  
 
== What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way  ? ==
 
== What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way  ? ==

Revision as of 12:34, 2 March 2016

Feedbacks after the Paris Code Sprint 2016 edition.

Aim is both to provide feedbacks to the sponsors, and to help prepare next editions...


Free Expression

Express in few words, few lines, (or pictures), what this Code Sprint was for you and yours projects. (link to blog or tweets are also fine...)

Some pictures are here

Lucadelu (talk) 06:57, 26 February 2016 (PST) - Really great organization and amazing coding place! Thanks to sponsor and organizer.

Tigerfoot (talk) 19:30, 27 February 2016 (PST) - Perfect organization and great place. My report here

Giuseppe Broccolo: http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/brin-postgis-codesprint2016-paris/

http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/tosprint/2016-February/000615.html

What should be kept for a next edition ?

What should be enhanced or at least not been done that way ?