Difference between revisions of "Geodata Committee Tenth Meeting"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
** http://project.knowledgeforge.net/geometa/trac/
 
** http://project.knowledgeforge.net/geometa/trac/
 
* How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required
 
* How to express "accuracy" and "quality" of geodata in metadata? Prior art required
''<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but  
+
:: ''<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but ''
                build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine  
+
:: ''build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine ''
                what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers  
+
:: ''what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers ''
                are appropriate for those
+
:: ''are appropriate for those''
 
 
''
 
 
* Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
 
* Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
 
** Extracting something specification-like from [[Geodata Metadata Requirements]]
 
** Extracting something specification-like from [[Geodata Metadata Requirements]]
 
** Implementations
 
** Implementations
 
* We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated
 
* We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated
 +
 +
[[Category:Public Geospatial Data Committee]]

Latest revision as of 07:34, 23 August 2007

Metadata

Chair: Jo Walsh 
 IRC: #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org (or via Web based IRC client)
 Date: 2006-December-14 (at least in the Americas and Europe)
 Time: 1600 GMT / 1100 East Coast / 1700 Europe (fixed time)

Agenda

<bitner> perhaps keep the geonerdy representations in the metadata, but
build a catalogue of use scenarios and as Geo-Professionals determine
what we feel are the appropriate scale numbers or ground error numbers
are appropriate for those
  • Next steps for formalising dclite4g schema
  • We will need to replace the http://geodata.osgeo.org/ website soon - any suggestions for a shiny new one, both form and content would be appreciated