Difference between revisions of "DockerImagesMeta"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
* ''whole of quai.io''
 
* ''whole of quai.io''
 
* GRASS with UI, see https://github.com/wenzeslaus/grass-gis-docker
 
* GRASS with UI, see https://github.com/wenzeslaus/grass-gis-docker
 +
* hale: https://hub.docker.com/u/wetransform/ and https://github.com/halestudio/hale-cli/issues/15#issuecomment-242744229
  
=== Projects with many images
+
== Projects with many images ==
  
 
The following searches on Docker Hub (and other registries, if possible!) result in a relatively large number of hits. Contributions in checking the "long tail" of these lists are highly welcome, so far only the most starred and downloaded images have been considered.
 
The following searches on Docker Hub (and other registries, if possible!) result in a relatively large number of hits. Contributions in checking the "long tail" of these lists are highly welcome, so far only the most starred and downloaded images have been considered.
Line 26: Line 27:
 
* osm2pgwsl: https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=osm2pgsql&starCount=0
 
* osm2pgwsl: https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=osm2pgsql&starCount=0
 
* CartodB, see https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=cartodb&starCount=0
 
* CartodB, see https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=cartodb&starCount=0
 
+
* GeoNetwork, see https://hub.docker.com/search/?isAutomated=0&isOfficial=0&page=1&pullCount=0&q=geonetwork&starCount=0
  
 
== Images and organisations with geo/GIS relation ==
 
== Images and organisations with geo/GIS relation ==
Line 45: Line 46:
 
== Sources ==
 
== Sources ==
  
* Docker Hub searches for "gis" and "geo", Aug 2016
+
The following searches have been applied so far (please add date and sign)
 +
 
 +
* Docker Hub searches for "gis" and "geo", Aug 2016, by [[DanielNuest]]
 
* https://2016.foss4g-na.org/session/spatial-data-processing-docker (see slides)
 
* https://2016.foss4g-na.org/session/spatial-data-processing-docker (see slides)
  
## Sorted out
+
=== Criteria ===
 +
 
 +
Criteria and data points (TBC)
 +
 
 +
* Goals / target users / applications (e.g. testing, dev env, new users, demos, …) clear?
 +
* Maintainer (most importantly: 3rd party or original devs?)
 +
* License
 +
* Base image
 +
* Quality of documentation
 +
 
 +
=== Sorted out ===
  
 
The following images have been sorted out during the searches. It will be worth rechecking them from time to time, as issues such as missing documentation can quickly be mitigated by maintainers.
 
The following images have been sorted out during the searches. It will be worth rechecking them from time to time, as issues such as missing documentation can quickly be mitigated by maintainers.

Latest revision as of 02:27, 23 November 2016

This page contains meta-information about the list of Docker images at DockerImages. It can be used to collect tasks and information about images not present in the main list.


TODO

Help welcome!

Projects with many images

The following searches on Docker Hub (and other registries, if possible!) result in a relatively large number of hits. Contributions in checking the "long tail" of these lists are highly welcome, so far only the most starred and downloaded images have been considered.

Images and organisations with geo/GIS relation

These images are not yet on the list - should they be?

docker-compose configurations

Should these be a separate list?

Sources

The following searches have been applied so far (please add date and sign)

Criteria

Criteria and data points (TBC)

  • Goals / target users / applications (e.g. testing, dev env, new users, demos, …) clear?
  • Maintainer (most importantly: 3rd party or original devs?)
  • License
  • Base image
  • Quality of documentation

Sorted out

The following images have been sorted out during the searches. It will be worth rechecking them from time to time, as issues such as missing documentation can quickly be mitigated by maintainers.