Difference between revisions of "MoU OGC/Review 2020"
< MoU OGC
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tomkralidis (talk | contribs) |
Tomkralidis (talk | contribs) |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* Franz-Josef Behr | * Franz-Josef Behr | ||
* Rajat Shinde | * Rajat Shinde | ||
| + | * Angelos Tzotsos | ||
| + | * Dimitris Kotzinos | ||
| + | * Bruce Bannerman | ||
| + | |||
| + | Issue tracker: https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/80 | ||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
| Line 19: | Line 24: | ||
* https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Open_Source_and_Open_Standards | * https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Open_Source_and_Open_Standards | ||
| − | ==Current State (2020) == | + | ==Current State (2020-) == |
* Reference implementations/demos | * Reference implementations/demos | ||
| Line 31: | Line 36: | ||
==Analysis== | ==Analysis== | ||
| − | + | * OGC: increase in developer focus and engagement of software development community | |
| − | + | * increased collaboration via OGC API sprints | |
| − | + | * FOSS4G is beneficial to all/for all software | |
==Opportunities== | ==Opportunities== | ||
| − | + | * aligned missions: FAIR data principles | |
| − | + | * developer focus | |
| − | + | * more sprints/cross pollination | |
| − | + | * OSGeo participation innovation projects | |
| − | + | * OSGeo representation vs. individual membership | |
| − | + | * OSGeo contribution to developer.ogc.org | |
| + | * OSGeo single membership provides SWG voting rights | ||
==Next Steps== | ==Next Steps== | ||
| − | Draft Exhibit A for review by OSGeo and OGC | + | [[MoU OGC/Review 2020/Draft|Draft Exhibit A for review by OSGeo and OGC]] |
==Conclusion== | ==Conclusion== | ||
Latest revision as of 13:54, 28 April 2022
Review Team
- Tom Kralidis
- Rob Atkinson
- Franz-Josef Behr
- Rajat Shinde
- Angelos Tzotsos
- Dimitris Kotzinos
- Bruce Bannerman
Issue tracker: https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/osgeo/todo/issues/80
Introduction
Overview
At the OSGeo Board 2019 face-to-face meeting in Bucharest, one of the topics covered was the OSGeo / OGC Memorandum of Understanding. OSGeo and OGC agreed that it would be a good time to review and update the MOU as required to reflect current requirements and opportunities.
Purpose
The purpose of this activity is to analyze the current OSGeo/OGC MOU to articulate opportunities in support of a renewed MOU.
Scope
This activity is bound to the OSGeo/OGC relationship.
Background
- MOU circa 2008
- https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_signs_Memorandum_of_Understanding_with_OGC
- https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Open_Source_and_Open_Standards
Current State (2020-)
- Reference implementations/demos
- OSGeo certification service
- 6 membership slots
- OSGeo Standards mailing list
- OSGeo participation in OGC
- OGC participation in OSGeo
- OGC API efforts and OSGeo implementations
Analysis
- OGC: increase in developer focus and engagement of software development community
- increased collaboration via OGC API sprints
- FOSS4G is beneficial to all/for all software
Opportunities
- aligned missions: FAIR data principles
- developer focus
- more sprints/cross pollination
- OSGeo participation innovation projects
- OSGeo representation vs. individual membership
- OSGeo contribution to developer.ogc.org
- OSGeo single membership provides SWG voting rights
Next Steps
Draft Exhibit A for review by OSGeo and OGC