Difference between revisions of "Talk:GeoForAll History"
m (Jive moved page Talk:Education and Curriculum Committee to Talk:GeoForAll History: Education committee renamed to GeoForAll) |
|||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Tyler Mitchell proposes keeping it short and sweet but meaningful and memorable: edu.osgeo.org | Tyler Mitchell proposes keeping it short and sweet but meaningful and memorable: edu.osgeo.org | ||
+ | |||
+ | I, [[User:Punkish | Puneet Kishor]], (along with most others on the committee -- five on last count) second Tyler's wonderfully simple suggestion. Unless anyone has a particular objection, edu.osgeo.org shall it be. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Unni Krishnan feels that the name edu could be confused with Internet's generic top-level domain .edu for educational institutions. Since you want to arrive at a Website name for the "education and curriculum committee", why not make it just ecc.osgeo.org or eacc.osgeo.org? |
Latest revision as of 12:44, 6 March 2016
Website name for the education and curriculum committee
I, Puneet Kishor, proposed ecogs.osgeo.org education curriculum open geo spatial (ecogs).
Ari Jolma suggested university.osgeo.org. I like Ari's suggestion better than my own. It has the advantage of being unambiguous, but, in Ari's words, might be a bit bold. My one lingering concern is that the academia might see our attempt at education as a parallel, competing, non-vetted effort.
Tyler Mitchell proposes keeping it short and sweet but meaningful and memorable: edu.osgeo.org
I, Puneet Kishor, (along with most others on the committee -- five on last count) second Tyler's wonderfully simple suggestion. Unless anyone has a particular objection, edu.osgeo.org shall it be.
Unni Krishnan feels that the name edu could be confused with Internet's generic top-level domain .edu for educational institutions. Since you want to arrive at a Website name for the "education and curriculum committee", why not make it just ecc.osgeo.org or eacc.osgeo.org?