Difference between revisions of "GDAL Incubation Progress"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Download area update.)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
; Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects we presence?  
 
; Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects we presence?  
−
: Yes, but the pages are generated from Doxygen and there isn't yet an automated process in place to update them regularly. Some aspects of left side toolbar are inappropriate (wrong bug and mailinglist pointers).  
+
: www.gdal.org and gdal.osgeo.org domains both work and are hosted on a telascience blade (also download.osgeo.org).  www.gdal.org is still the primary url for the project.
  
 
; Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?   
 
; Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?   
−
: No.  GDAL has a great wealth of history in it's existing Bugzilla instance, and this would be nearly impossible to move. Sticking with existing Bugzilla instance for the time being.  
+
: Yes.  GDAL is using http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal.
  
 
; Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?
 
; Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?
−
: No.  It is anticipated that new gdal-announce and gdal-users mailing lists may be started on the foundation mailing list manager in the near future but this is pending discussion on gdal-dev. I have no plans to move gdal-dev at this time as it would be hard to bring along archives and user options.  This may be revisited in the future.  
+
: The gdal-dev list remains hosted at maptools.org to avoid disruption.  The new gdal-announce and gdal-commits lists are hosted on http://lists.osgeo.org
  
 
; Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?
 
; Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?
−
: No, not yet, but a transition is planned after the GDAL 1.3.2 release to CN SVN.  
+
: Yes, OSGeo subversion is being used.
  
 
; Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?
 
; Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?
−
: Source, documentation and test suite files are available in the OSGeo download area.  Binaries are not currently available there (normally GDAL points people to FWTools).
+
: Source, documentation and test suite files are available in the OSGeo download area (http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/).  Only limited binaries are available there.  Currently the GDAL project only supplies binaries for win32.  Other efforts, like FWTools and FGS provide binaries for other platforms.
  
 
== Community Functioning ==
 
== Community Functioning ==
Line 33: Line 33:
  
 
; Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
 
; Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
−
: The project steering committee has been selected, but has not been assigned control of the project yet.  The members are Frank Warmerdam (chair), Andrey Kiselev, Daniel Morissette and Howard Butler.  The PSC is expected to "take control" after the GDAL 1.3.1 release is completed.
+
: Yes, the project steering committee has been selected, and [http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc RFC1] governing it's operation has been adopted.  The members are Frank Warmerdam (chair), Andrey Kiselev, Daniel Morissette, Howard Butler and Tamas Szekeres.   
  
 
; Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.  
 
; Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.  
−
: An RFC-1 defining the role of the PSC has been written but not adopted (http://www.gdal.org/srctree/rfc/RFC1_PMC.TXT).  No other guidelines have been prepared.  
+
: [http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc1_pmc RFC1] defines the role of the PSC.  Contributor guidelines are adopted and documented in [http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc3_commiters RFC3].  All current commiters have agreed to the commiter guidelines.
  
 
; How many active developers are there?  Are they from multiple organizations?
 
; How many active developers are there?  Are they from multiple organizations?
−
: There are approximately 27 current committers that have contributed within the last year.  They are from a wide variety of organizations and some are individuals.
+
: There are approximately 29 current committers that have contributed within the last year.  They are from a wide variety of organizations and some are individuals.
  
 
== Foundation Membership ==
 
== Foundation Membership ==
  
 
; Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
 
; Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
−
: No, this should be done soon after the 1.3.2 release.
+
: Yes, details on membership and governance have been prepared on the [http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/GovernanceAndCommunity GDAL Governance Page].
  
 
; Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?  
 
; Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?  
−
: No.  An OSGeo branding approach has not yet been defined.  It's application to Doxygen generated web pages may be challenging.  
+
: The GDAL pages describe GDAL participation in OSGeo.  No other effort at branding has been defined or applied.
  
 
== Code Copyright Review ==
 
== Code Copyright Review ==
  
 
; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project?
 
; Has a [[Code Provenance Review]] document been prepared for the project?
−
: A document is under constructions at [[GDAL Provenance Review]] but is not yet complete.
+
: A document is under constructions at [[GDAL Provenance Review]] though a few areas remain to be investigated.
  
 
; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
 
; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
−
: No
+
: Many have been resolved, but some remain.  Most outstanding issues (marked TO_RESOLVE in the provenance review) now have GDAL bug tickets associated with them.
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Incubation]]

Latest revision as of 19:28, 11 September 2007

Basics

Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?
Yes, GDAL is a board approved "founding project".
Has an OSGeo committee member been assigned as Mentor?
Yes, Paul Spencer is assigned as mentor.

Infrastructure Transition

Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects we presence?
www.gdal.org and gdal.osgeo.org domains both work and are hosted on a telascience blade (also download.osgeo.org). www.gdal.org is still the primary url for the project.
Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
Yes. GDAL is using http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal.
Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?
The gdal-dev list remains hosted at maptools.org to avoid disruption. The new gdal-announce and gdal-commits lists are hosted on http://lists.osgeo.org
Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?
Yes, OSGeo subversion is being used.
Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?
Source, documentation and test suite files are available in the OSGeo download area (http://download.osgeo.org/gdal/). Only limited binaries are available there. Currently the GDAL project only supplies binaries for win32. Other efforts, like FWTools and FGS provide binaries for other platforms.

Community Functioning

Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
Yes, the gdal-dev list is currently the primary mechanism for user support. Most questions are answered reasonably promptly. Traffic averages 10 messages per day.
Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
Yes. Source is available from the project page. Binaries are provided as part of FWTools. Currently there are no "release binaries" offered as part of the project.
Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
Yes, the project steering committee has been selected, and RFC1 governing it's operation has been adopted. The members are Frank Warmerdam (chair), Andrey Kiselev, Daniel Morissette, Howard Butler and Tamas Szekeres.
Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
RFC1 defines the role of the PSC. Contributor guidelines are adopted and documented in RFC3. All current commiters have agreed to the commiter guidelines.
How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?
There are approximately 29 current committers that have contributed within the last year. They are from a wide variety of organizations and some are individuals.

Foundation Membership

Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
Yes, details on membership and governance have been prepared on the GDAL Governance Page.
Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
The GDAL pages describe GDAL participation in OSGeo. No other effort at branding has been defined or applied.

Code Copyright Review

Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?
A document is under constructions at GDAL Provenance Review though a few areas remain to be investigated.
Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
Many have been resolved, but some remain. Most outstanding issues (marked TO_RESOLVE in the provenance review) now have GDAL bug tickets associated with them.
Retrieved from "http://wiki.osgeo.org/w/index.php?title=GDAL_Incubation_Progress&oldid=18029"