Difference between revisions of "Membership Process 2016"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Voting: removed reference to fixed number of 15 new members (20 in 2011))
(Redirected page to Archived)
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
'''Approved at [[Twenty Sixth Board Meeting]] - page now protected'''
+
#REDIRECT [[Archived]]
 +
 
 +
'''Approved by board [[Board_Meeting_2016-8-24#OSGeo_charter_member_election_procedure|vote]] in August 2016.'''
  
 
= General Process =
 
= General Process =
  
−
Each year some number of new charter members are nominated and elected by the OSGeo charter members, in a process operated by the [[Chief Returning Officer]] (CRO).  The number of new members will be between 10% and one third of the existing charter membership count as decided by the board. Read more about the role of charter members on the OSGeo portal page http://www.osgeo.org/membership.
+
Each year new charter members are nominated and elected by existing OSGeo charter members, in a process operated by the [[Chief Returning Officer]] (CRO).   
  
 +
Previously:
 +
 +
* [[Membership Process 2014]]  '''Approved by board [http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2014-July/011785.html vote] in July 2014.'''
 +
 
== Nominations ==
 
== Nominations ==
  
−
# The nominations period should be roughly 1 week, and should be announced by the CRO on the OSGeo announce and discuss lists.
+
# The nominations period should be roughly 2 weeks, and should be announced by the CRO on the OSGeo announce and discuss lists.
−
# Nominations for charter membership should be sent to the CRO (at cro@osgeo.org).  
+
#* A person may ask a  [http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/members/voting_members.html charter member] who can vouch for the [http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Membership_Process#Positive_Attributes Positive Attributes] of the person to nominate them.
−
# Anyone who is not already a charter member is a potential nominee.  
+
# An existing [http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/members/voting_members.html charter member] can nominate potential new Charter Member(s).
−
# The CRO should verify with the nominee that they are willing to stand for the election.  This should include an explanation of charter membership responsibilities.   Once confirmed, the CRO should forward the nomination to the OSGeo discuss list.  No seconder is required.
+
#* Nominees should meet the [[Membership_Process#Positive_Attributes Positive Attributes]] for Charter Members.
−
# All OSGeo members (members as well as charter members) are encouraged to discuss candidates on the discuss list.  
+
#* Please confirm with the nominated person first!
−
# Once all the nominations close, a summary of charter candidates will be prepared and posted by the CRO to the OSGeo discuss list.
+
#* Please email cro@osgeo.org with their '''name''', '''contact email''' and '''paragraph describing why you are recommending this person as a Charter Member''' 
 +
# CRO will verify with the nominee that they are willing to stand for nomination
 +
#* The CRO will include an explanation of [[Membership_Process#Responsibilities charter membership responsibilities]].
 +
#* The CRO will invite new charter members to update/create their OSGeo Advocate profile, as per: [[OSGeo_Advocate#Process_for_becoming_an_OSGeo_Advocate]].  
 +
#* Once confirmed by the nominee the CRO will send the nomination to discuss@osgeo.org
 +
#A nomination must be seconded by at least one other charter member
 +
#* CRO will gather nominations into a candidates list to be presented to the OSGeo board
 +
# Candidate review
 +
#* All OSGeo members (members as well as charter members) are encouraged to discuss candidates on the discuss list.
 +
#* A veto may be raised by any OSGeo charter member by sending a private e-mail to the CRO (at cro@osgeo.org)
 +
# Once all the nominations close
 +
#* CRO will gather any and all vetos for the OSGeo board for an anonymous review
 +
#* If the veto is accepted by the board, then the CRO shall reply to the public discuss@osgeo.org and the nomination is removed from the CROs candidates list
 +
#* A summary of charter candidates will be prepared and presented by the CRO to the OSGeo board
 +
#* When approved by the OSGeo board the candidates will be added as charter members and posted to the OSGeo discuss list.
  
−
== Voting ==
+
= Positive Attributes =  
  
−
# Voting occurs roughly one week after nominations close.
+
Recommended membership selection criteria include:
−
# The CRO should ensure that all charter members receive the voting announcement - the OSGeo Secretary can provide a charter member list with contact info.
 
−
# Each charter member will have one vote per nominee
 
−
# The vote is sent as an email with one nominee name per line.
 
−
# All votes will be sent to cro@osgeo.org, which is archived and forwarded to the CRO for counting.
 
−
# Charter members may apply all their votes to a single person or distribute them in integral amounts over multiple candidates.
 
−
# The voting period is roughly 1 week long.
 
−
# Once complete the CRO tallies votes and the new charter membership are assigned to the candidates with the most votes.
 
−
# In case of a vote tie, the CRO will use some suitable random method to select from the tied candidates to fill the new positions.
 
−
# The CRO will announce the selected charter members on discuss@lists.osgeo.org, update the official list with the Secretary, and update the [http://www.osgeo.org/content/foundation/members/voting_members.html web site].
 
  
−
= Positive Attributes =  
+
* Members should believe in the general goals of the Foundation. To support and promote the use of free and open source geospatial software, education and data in a collaborative manner.
 +
* Previous participation in or support of OSGeo activities
 +
* The person should already have made a contribution to free and open source geospatial software, education or open data.
 +
* The person should be willing to put in time and effort on the Foundation, perhaps joining committee(s), or volunteering in some other way that gets the Foundation going.
 +
* Members should be prepared to work constructively and positively towards the goals of the Foundation. Good teamwork skills are an asset.
 +
 
 +
Membership nominations should strive to promote diversity:
 +
 
 +
* Nominate members representing a diversity of geographic regions, diversity of projects, diversity of programming languages.
 +
* Nominate members representing and diversity of interests (e.g., corporate, hobbyist, educational, scientific).
 +
* Nominate members representing a diversity of humanity including gender and race
 +
 
 +
= Responsibilities =
 +
 
 +
Official responsibilities for charter members are important, but relatively light. As of August 2014, they include:
 +
# Annually vote for OSGeo Board members.
 +
# Annually vote for new OSGeo Charter members.
 +
# Be aware of and protect against a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeover#Hostile takeover] of OSGeo by single group or viewpoint. This threat is incredibly low but has been known to occur in other volunteer organisations.
 +
 
 +
= Questions =
 +
 
 +
The following questions have been asked during the election process, if you have a question please reach out to the discuss@osgeo.org email list.
 +
 
 +
* Q: What is meant by hostile takeover
 +
** Charter Members have the responsibility of voting responsibly "preserving the integrity" of the OSGeo Foundation. A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Takeover#Hostile takeover] in this context would be a change of management, without the consent of the members resulting in a new direction of the organization.
 +
 
 +
* Q:  Where are people to send nominations?
 +
** Please email your nomination to cro@osgeo.org as outlined above, the chief returning officer will email discuss@osgeo.org after updating the wiki page of nominations.
 +
** Be careful about emailing the discuss@osgeo directly, your candidate may be missed!
 +
 
 +
* Q: Will the nominated person who has been vetoed be publicly named (this might be seen as insensitive and might be best to inform them privately).
 +
** The board motion calls for transparency in this manner, it may be enough to indicate that the nomination was unsuccessful.
 +
 
 +
* Q: Will the person sending the veto be named?
 +
** The review is conducted blind by the board.
 +
 
 +
* Q: Will the board member votes be made public?
 +
** Yes (The board publish minuets of all meetings)
  
−
Previously suggested (but unofficial) membership selection criteria include:
+
* Q: Will the reasons someone has been excluded be made public?
−
* Previous participation in or support of OSGeo activities
+
** Reasons will be discussed as part of the blind review process.
−
* The person should have made a contribution to free and open source geospatial software already.
 
−
* The person should be willing to put in time and effort on the foundation, perhaps joining committee(s), or volunteering in some other way that gets the foundation going.
 
−
* Members should believe in the general goals of the foundation. To support and promote the use of free and open source geospatial software in a collaborative manner.
 
−
* Members selected should provide a diversity of geographic representation in the foundation.
 
−
* Members selected should provide representation of a diversity of projects. For instance, we have a strong desire to see the "Java tribe" well represented in the foundation.  We don't want the membership dominated by folks from just one project.
 
−
* Members selected should provide representation of a diversity of interests (e.g., corporate, hobbyist, educational, scientific).
 
−
* Members should be prepared to work constructively and positively towards the goals of the foundation. Good teamwork skills are an asset.
 
  
 
[[Category:Membership]]
 
[[Category:Membership]]
 
[[Category:Elections]]
 
[[Category:Elections]]
 +
[[Category:Election 2017]]

Latest revision as of 20:24, 24 August 2019

Redirect to:

Approved by board vote in August 2016.

General Process

Each year new charter members are nominated and elected by existing OSGeo charter members, in a process operated by the Chief Returning Officer (CRO).

Previously:

Nominations

  1. The nominations period should be roughly 2 weeks, and should be announced by the CRO on the OSGeo announce and discuss lists.
  2. An existing charter member can nominate potential new Charter Member(s).
    • Nominees should meet the Membership_Process#Positive_Attributes Positive Attributes for Charter Members.
    • Please confirm with the nominated person first!
    • Please email cro@osgeo.org with their name, contact email and paragraph describing why you are recommending this person as a Charter Member
  3. CRO will verify with the nominee that they are willing to stand for nomination
  4. A nomination must be seconded by at least one other charter member
    • CRO will gather nominations into a candidates list to be presented to the OSGeo board
  5. Candidate review
    • All OSGeo members (members as well as charter members) are encouraged to discuss candidates on the discuss list.
    • A veto may be raised by any OSGeo charter member by sending a private e-mail to the CRO (at cro@osgeo.org)
  6. Once all the nominations close
    • CRO will gather any and all vetos for the OSGeo board for an anonymous review
    • If the veto is accepted by the board, then the CRO shall reply to the public discuss@osgeo.org and the nomination is removed from the CROs candidates list
    • A summary of charter candidates will be prepared and presented by the CRO to the OSGeo board
    • When approved by the OSGeo board the candidates will be added as charter members and posted to the OSGeo discuss list.

Positive Attributes

Recommended membership selection criteria include:

  • Members should believe in the general goals of the Foundation. To support and promote the use of free and open source geospatial software, education and data in a collaborative manner.
  • Previous participation in or support of OSGeo activities
  • The person should already have made a contribution to free and open source geospatial software, education or open data.
  • The person should be willing to put in time and effort on the Foundation, perhaps joining committee(s), or volunteering in some other way that gets the Foundation going.
  • Members should be prepared to work constructively and positively towards the goals of the Foundation. Good teamwork skills are an asset.

Membership nominations should strive to promote diversity:

  • Nominate members representing a diversity of geographic regions, diversity of projects, diversity of programming languages.
  • Nominate members representing and diversity of interests (e.g., corporate, hobbyist, educational, scientific).
  • Nominate members representing a diversity of humanity including gender and race

Responsibilities

Official responsibilities for charter members are important, but relatively light. As of August 2014, they include:

  1. Annually vote for OSGeo Board members.
  2. Annually vote for new OSGeo Charter members.
  3. Be aware of and protect against a takeover of OSGeo by single group or viewpoint. This threat is incredibly low but has been known to occur in other volunteer organisations.

Questions

The following questions have been asked during the election process, if you have a question please reach out to the discuss@osgeo.org email list.

  • Q: What is meant by hostile takeover
    • Charter Members have the responsibility of voting responsibly "preserving the integrity" of the OSGeo Foundation. A takeover in this context would be a change of management, without the consent of the members resulting in a new direction of the organization.
  • Q: Where are people to send nominations?
    • Please email your nomination to cro@osgeo.org as outlined above, the chief returning officer will email discuss@osgeo.org after updating the wiki page of nominations.
    • Be careful about emailing the discuss@osgeo directly, your candidate may be missed!
  • Q: Will the nominated person who has been vetoed be publicly named (this might be seen as insensitive and might be best to inform them privately).
    • The board motion calls for transparency in this manner, it may be enough to indicate that the nomination was unsuccessful.
  • Q: Will the person sending the veto be named?
    • The review is conducted blind by the board.
  • Q: Will the board member votes be made public?
    • Yes (The board publish minuets of all meetings)
  • Q: Will the reasons someone has been excluded be made public?
    • Reasons will be discussed as part of the blind review process.
Retrieved from "http://wiki.osgeo.org/w/index.php?title=Membership_Process_2016&oldid=121407"