Difference between revisions of "FOSS4G 2018 Lessons Learned"
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
This is to document things that the local committee learned, for the benefit of future FOSS4Gs!! | This is to document things that the local committee learned, for the benefit of future FOSS4Gs!! | ||
=== Unique Dar es Salaam Approaches & Challenges === | === Unique Dar es Salaam Approaches & Challenges === | ||
| − | Conference was run as a set of 3 overlapping, synergistic conferences: | + | Conference was run as a set of '''3 overlapping, synergistic conferences''': |
* FOSS4G | * FOSS4G | ||
* HOTOSM | * HOTOSM | ||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
We could have done better in making clear what community attendees represented. For example, HOTOSM had some people use a special coupon; but many registered without the coupon, but we don't know who they were, or how many were represented. | We could have done better in making clear what community attendees represented. For example, HOTOSM had some people use a special coupon; but many registered without the coupon, but we don't know who they were, or how many were represented. | ||
| − | Cash and currency challenges were very different than previous conferences. | + | '''Cash and currency challenges''' were very different than previous conferences. |
* Had challenges with Pesapal at the outset. | * Had challenges with Pesapal at the outset. | ||
* Paypal worked well, but many African encouraged us to have another option. | * Paypal worked well, but many African encouraged us to have another option. | ||
Revision as of 05:20, 18 September 2018
Previous Years Lessons Learned
FOSS4G 2018 Lessons Learned
This is to document things that the local committee learned, for the benefit of future FOSS4Gs!!
Unique Dar es Salaam Approaches & Challenges
Conference was run as a set of 3 overlapping, synergistic conferences:
- FOSS4G
- HOTOSM
- Understanding Risk Tanzania
We could have done better in making clear what community attendees represented. For example, HOTOSM had some people use a special coupon; but many registered without the coupon, but we don't know who they were, or how many were represented.
Cash and currency challenges were very different than previous conferences.
- Had challenges with Pesapal at the outset.
- Paypal worked well, but many African encouraged us to have another option.
- The need for large amounts cash for certain venue payments was a reality; and some challenges getting large amounts of cash on demand (i.e., cash machine limitations).
Logo
Sponsorship
LOC Organization
Marketing
Discounts
Travel Grants
Bringing as many people as you can is noble, but need a long lead time. Awardees need a long amount of lead-time to put a big trip together.
Response was overwhelming. Huge number of applicants, so selection was difficult. ~350 applicants in the first round; and, ~700 applicants in the second round for >1,050 total. 132 total grants were awarded and 92 people were able to attend. Most of the round 2 drop outs were due to late notification. Of the first 50 awarded in round 1, only 10 were unable to come, mostly due to not getting any supplemental funding support.
Criteria that reflect conference team priorities are crucial for weeding through such a large number of applications. It's important to state the conference team's priorities in the "call for grant applications" so attendees know what team's goals are. All 1,000+ applications were read, but the top priorities were:
- Tanzanian based attendees
- African based attendees
- Woman attendees
Need to have a single point-person "owning" the TGP and can keep it moving. Need to start as early as possible.
Beneficial to have awardees paid after they arrived at the conference. Avoids hassles of last minute complications and no-shows (e.g., plane tickets paid for and then not used).