Difference between revisions of "Marketing Committee Budget 2024"
Astrid emde (talk | contribs) (Created page with "= OSGeo Budget = * https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Budget_2024 * approved: = Proposed Budget 2024 = The following draft is for discussion {|class="wikitable" border="2"...") |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
! Item | ! Item | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | | style="text-align:right;" | | + | | style="text-align:right;" | 5,000-$10000 TBD |
| OSGeo website map integration (quick EOI to our community) | | OSGeo website map integration (quick EOI to our community) | ||
|- | |- | ||
| style="text-align:right;" | (TBD) | | style="text-align:right;" | (TBD) | ||
| − | | Graphics support for updates to website and | + | | Graphics support for updates to website and collateral |
|- | |- | ||
! TOTAL (''minus Tentative'') | ! TOTAL (''minus Tentative'') | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | == OSGeo website map integration == | ||
| + | |||
| + | The OSGeo website was designed with a map and color palette (obviously); but the initial OSM integration was so poor it is an open only visible to from the member filter menu and GeoForAll labs. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We assumed that as a geospatial software foundation our community would be able to handle this but no volunteers have stepped forward. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Graphic designer support == | ||
| + | |||
| + | We have had a number of requests for the website stacking up from the very simple, to the more demanding. | ||
| + | - update social media options (mastodon, x, etc...) | ||
| + | - set up tiles for the public facing committees (presently we have a bullet point list) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Preference would be to contact GeoBeyond if the original design is available. Going with an alternate choice will require reviewing the decisions made going into the initial design (while there are presentations and meeting notes such a diversion would increase level of effort). | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Outreach collateral == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Projects did not have access to InDesign and chose a wide range of technologies to produce one page PDFs (InkScape, Scribus, Sketch). While Jody made some effort to make these presentations consistent; variations in fonts, logo position are still present. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Updated banner designs with space allocated for sponsor logos (to be affixed with magnets or similar). This is an also an opportunity to better show case the branding integration of regional aerial/drone photography. | ||
[[Category:Marketing]] | [[Category:Marketing]] | ||
Revision as of 07:13, 25 December 2023
OSGeo Budget
Proposed Budget 2024
The following draft is for discussion
| Committee Budget | Item |
|---|---|
| $3,000 | Marketing/Outreach/Advocacy sprint Event (could be at FOSS4G 2024) |
| Event Budget | Item |
| $2,000 | Brochures, project sheet, USB sticks and banners for various FOSS4G's in 2024 |
| $1,000 | FOSS4G 2024 Full booth required, banners, table cloths, stickers, collateral, usb-sticks, ... |
| $1,000 | podcast scale up |
| Tentative | Item |
| 5,000-$10000 TBD | OSGeo website map integration (quick EOI to our community) |
| (TBD) | Graphics support for updates to website and collateral |
| TOTAL (minus Tentative) | Item |
| $7,000 (tbd) | Pending discussion of tentative items above |
OSGeo website map integration
The OSGeo website was designed with a map and color palette (obviously); but the initial OSM integration was so poor it is an open only visible to from the member filter menu and GeoForAll labs.
We assumed that as a geospatial software foundation our community would be able to handle this but no volunteers have stepped forward.
Graphic designer support
We have had a number of requests for the website stacking up from the very simple, to the more demanding. - update social media options (mastodon, x, etc...) - set up tiles for the public facing committees (presently we have a bullet point list)
Preference would be to contact GeoBeyond if the original design is available. Going with an alternate choice will require reviewing the decisions made going into the initial design (while there are presentations and meeting notes such a diversion would increase level of effort).
Outreach collateral
Projects did not have access to InDesign and chose a wide range of technologies to produce one page PDFs (InkScape, Scribus, Sketch). While Jody made some effort to make these presentations consistent; variations in fonts, logo position are still present.
Updated banner designs with space allocated for sponsor logos (to be affixed with magnets or similar). This is an also an opportunity to better show case the branding integration of regional aerial/drone photography.