Difference between revisions of "SAC Meeting 2018-01-18"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Setting the agenda for jan 18) |
|||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
=== Migration off old hard-ware AND Virtualization, Containerization, or None ==== | === Migration off old hard-ware AND Virtualization, Containerization, or None ==== | ||
− | + | ''From last meeting'' | |
− | + | ||
+ | '''Migration''' | ||
* Alex: needs feedback on the questions about direction we want to go | * Alex: needs feedback on the questions about direction we want to go | ||
* Decide on virtualization method or container method I can narrow it down | * Decide on virtualization method or container method I can narrow it down | ||
Line 48: | Line 49: | ||
* what do we need to decide today ? | * what do we need to decide today ? | ||
** if the new hardware will be virtualization based or container based, or neither | ** if the new hardware will be virtualization based or container based, or neither | ||
− | + | ||
+ | '''Virtualization''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | * We need to decide about Virtualization and Containerization plans. | ||
* OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work. | * OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work. | ||
* Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine. | * Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine. | ||
* It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top. | * It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top. | ||
− | + | ** [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1uXa3f_AczHk4gXwIx6NOGt7_MD4p76To Hardware Option 1-3] $3000-$7500, [https://drive.google.com/open?id=1f3D0tOP5qsEOyoi0DTR0Lyk_9MYDFeOv Hardware Option 4] $6300 | |
− | + | *** It's hard to find a dual cpu or high core count in a smaller case. So the more expensive systems could be less if we opt to not fill the drive slots. However we do need space for the foss4g archive and the downloads. So maybe a mix of SSD and Spinning... | |
− | + | *** Option 4 based on a mix of SSD and Spinning disks for large and fast storage. Downloads can be handled by spinning SATA. | |
− | + | ** Hosting Option: OSUOSL - VM of our choosing just like other cloud services. | |
− | + | ** Hosting Option: Other | |
− | + | '''TODO discuss on list''' | |
''' Report ''' | ''' Report ''' | ||
− | Due to the website launching, the discussion on the list didn't start | + | Due to the website launching, the discussion on the list didn't start. |
− | |||
− | |||
=== Motions status: === | === Motions status: === |
Revision as of 15:11, 16 January 2018
Agenda
Go over status of SSL - FOSS4G2018
From last meeting:
- Website code: https://github.com/foss4g2018/foss4g2018
- The code for the payments is also very simple HTML - we'd be happy to host in a single point
- 3rd party payment service: Pesapal
- post-meeting. To be moved to webextra, with ssl in front
- merge them and have the payment site be something like https:/2018.foss4g.org/registration
- ragnvald: https://github.com/timlinux/foss4g2018
- Ensure we have continuity within our payment systems
<Fill report here>
New Website status report
<Fill report here>
References:
Sys Admin Contract
- Missing Signature OSGeo
- Some pressure is needed to speed up.
<Fill report here>
Migration off old hard-ware AND Virtualization, Containerization, or None =
From last meeting
Migration
- Alex: needs feedback on the questions about direction we want to go
- Decide on virtualization method or container method I can narrow it down
- Provide some mailing list time for modification suggestions, before a vote
- Concerning virtualization method: Who's going to maintain that one ?
- MartinSpott: I just don't want - again - get into a position to maintain KVM
- strk: I've no experience with libvirt/ganeti/openstack
- wildintellect: KVM itself is packaged
- proposal: the one who decides in favour of a particular technique signs responsibility for maintaining it
- what do we need to decide today ?
- if the new hardware will be virtualization based or container based, or neither
Virtualization
- We need to decide about Virtualization and Containerization plans.
- OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work.
- Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine.
- It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
- Hardware Option 1-3 $3000-$7500, Hardware Option 4 $6300
- It's hard to find a dual cpu or high core count in a smaller case. So the more expensive systems could be less if we opt to not fill the drive slots. However we do need space for the foss4g archive and the downloads. So maybe a mix of SSD and Spinning...
- Option 4 based on a mix of SSD and Spinning disks for large and fast storage. Downloads can be handled by spinning SATA.
- Hosting Option: OSUOSL - VM of our choosing just like other cloud services.
- Hosting Option: Other
- Hardware Option 1-3 $3000-$7500, Hardware Option 4 $6300
TODO discuss on list
Report Due to the website launching, the discussion on the list didn't start.
Motions status:
- Motion to add Vicky Vergara to SAC team Pending resolution
- Jody Garnett nominate to join SAC Motion passed.
GeoForAll DNS
- Jeff & Vicky:
- No progress
GitLab Status report
- <Fill report here>
Others
- <Fill report here>
Minutes
Attendance
Full transcript
http://irclogs.geoapt.com/osgeo-sac/%23osgeo-sac.2018-01-18.log
Details
Next Meeting
Proposed Time: UTC: Thursday, February 1st, 2018 at 8:00 pm