Difference between revisions of "MapServer incubation status"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Basics) |
(Category:Incubation) |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ; Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed? | ||
: indicate outstanding issues. | : indicate outstanding issues. | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Incubation]] |
Revision as of 04:00, 21 August 2006
Basics
- Has the project been approved for incubation by the OSGeo board?
- Yes, selected for "founding project" incubation by the OSGeo board.
- Has an Incubation committee member been assigned as Mentor?
- Yes, Chris Holmes has been assigned as MapServer incubation mentor.
Infrastructure Transition
- Has the projectname.osgeo.org domain been populated with the projects web presence?
- No. This may be a major issue since we have invested a tremendous amount of time developing a Plone-based site. The is no desire to move away from that platform.
- Is the OSGeo bug tracker being used for the project?
- No. A bugzilla repository is still hosted at the University of Minnesota.
- Bug tracking repository moved?
- No. A bugzilla repository is still hosted at the University of Minnesota.
- Is the OSGeo mailing list manager being used for the project?
- No. mailing lists are hosted at http://lists.umn.edu/ and we would like to move to OSGeo hosted lists at some point soon.
- Is the OSGeo SVN or CVS system being used for the project?
- No. Code is hosted in CVS at cvs.gis.umn.edu and is ok for now. Would like to move at some point.
- Are binary and source downloads available from the OSGeo download area?
- No, currently still just at the UMN download site.
Community Functioning
- Is there a functioning user support mechanisms (ie. mailing list)?
- The mapserver-users mailing list is quite active and well posed questions often result in more than one helpful response.
- Are source and binary downloads for the package available?
- Yes, visit http://mapserver.gis.umn.edu/
- Has a Project Steering Committee been formed, and given control of the project?
- Partially. MapServer has a technical steering committee that will likely fill this role. RFC-1 will have to be ammended to establish the TSC as the PSC.
- Does the Project Steering Committee have documentation on project procedures for PSC decisions, contributor guidelines, etc.
- Yes, see RFC's (for TSC, and committer rules at least). May need to review committer rules in light of tighter OSGeo policy.
- How many active developers are there? Are they from multiple organizations?
- Yes, approximately 15 committers are established from 10 or more organizations.
Foundation Membership
- Have project documents been updated to reflect membership in the foundation, and the relationship of the project to the foundation?
- If not, indicate when this will occur.
- Has an effort been made to brand the project web site with OSGeo foundation web styling and branding marks?
- If not, indicate what is planned. (note: currently an OSGeo web style has not bee established)
Code Copyright Review
- Has a Code Provenance Review document been prepared for the project?
- Code provenance review not yet begun alothough a list of siginificant contributors is being established. That roster is available on the main MapServer website.
- Have issues raised in the provenance review been adequately addressed?
- indicate outstanding issues.