Difference between revisions of "Board Meeting 2022-06-27"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "This board meeting is '''scheduled Monday 27 June 2022''' at [https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2022&month=06&day=27&hour=15&min=0&sec=0&p1=250&p...")
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
# ''Review and approve past minutes''
 
# ''Review and approve past minutes''
 
#* [[Board_Meeting_2022-05-30]]
 
#* [[Board_Meeting_2022-05-30]]
# ''Add your topic here''
+
# [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2022-June/013052.html Vote outcome for FOSS4G2023 venue ]
 +
# ''discussion item: is it a problem to have only one FOSS4G proposal in any year?''
 +
# OSGeo OGC MOU
 +
## Update/status
 +
## ''discussion item: how can we support OSGeo projects as reference implementations for OGC standards''
 +
# [https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2022-June/013058.html ESA Open Call letter of support]
 +
 
  
 
== Minutes ==
 
== Minutes ==
  
* Presiding:  
+
* Presiding: Michele
* Scribing:  
+
* Scribing: Vicky, Rajat
* Attending:  
+
* Attending: Tom, Michele, Angelos, Rajat, Tom, Codrina
 
* Guests:  
 
* Guests:  
  
 +
===Review and approve past minutes===
 +
 +
* Motion passed on Loomio: https://www.loomio.org/p/JiFTKsxr/approve-meeting-minutes-from-board-meeting-2022-05-30
 +
 +
=== Vote outcome for FOSS4G2023 venue ===
 +
 +
* Motion passed on Loomio: https://www.loomio.org/p/6pl0y1dG/motion-to-approve-selection-of-prizren-loc-to-host-foss4g-2023
 +
 +
=== Discussion item: is it a problem to have only one FOSS4G proposal in any year?===
 +
 +
* This topic is suitable for a f2f meeting.
 +
* Depends on the LOC considering the pandemic
 +
* Way and relation with OSGeo and organizer
 +
* Aside from offering all the support, board may think of contractual point of view
 +
* Question: What if nobody applies? Thoughts!
 +
** Can there be an online conference?
 +
** FOSS4G holds impact more than a conference; potential business collaboration; meeting with peers
 +
* Question: What about the modifications in framework to address lack of interest by LOCs?
 +
** Need to publicize that hosting of FOSS4G brings local economic developments
 +
** Need support with the digital infrastructure like PreTalks, email system, and ticketing system
 +
 +
=== OSGeo OGC MOU ===
 +
 +
* Update/Status
 +
**Press release is out - OGC and OSGeo on June 7 (https://www.osgeo.org/foundation-news/ogc-and-osgeo-sign-new-memorandum-of-understanding/)
 +
**Need to sign the membership agreement (Angelos)
 +
* Discussion item: how can we support OSGeo projects as reference implementations for OGC standards?
 +
** Need to check the exact freecharged number of reference implementations allowed by OGC to the OSGeo projects; any preference to specific projects
 +
 +
=== ESA Open Call letter of support ===
 +
 +
* Link: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2022-June/013058.html
 +
* Thoughts: It's a letter of recommendation for a company and the employees of the company are the OSGeo members.
 +
* It was not a question of the trust but the time required for submitting the LoR
 +
* The friction was due to provide openness to all the potential participants (in case of a company) to provide the time to all, as discussed and decided over the protocol (which will require voting of the board to break to protocol)
 +
* What will happen in case of any individual? Any predefined procedure…About updating the wiki page for Letter of Support for the individuals and action item for f2f meeting
 +
** Thoughts: updated profile or member page; Try to encourage their position as Charter Member
  
 
=== Actions ===
 
=== Actions ===

Latest revision as of 02:25, 25 July 2022

This board meeting is scheduled Monday 27 June 2022 at 15:00 UTC through Jitsi, a record of motions is preserved on loomio and actions on osgeo todo issue tracker.

Agenda

Current items

  1. roll call
  2. appoint meeting chair, meeting scribe/secretary
  3. Review and approve past minutes
  4. Vote outcome for FOSS4G2023 venue
  5. discussion item: is it a problem to have only one FOSS4G proposal in any year?
  6. OSGeo OGC MOU
    1. Update/status
    2. discussion item: how can we support OSGeo projects as reference implementations for OGC standards
  7. ESA Open Call letter of support


Minutes

  • Presiding: Michele
  • Scribing: Vicky, Rajat
  • Attending: Tom, Michele, Angelos, Rajat, Tom, Codrina
  • Guests:

Review and approve past minutes

Vote outcome for FOSS4G2023 venue

Discussion item: is it a problem to have only one FOSS4G proposal in any year?

  • This topic is suitable for a f2f meeting.
  • Depends on the LOC considering the pandemic
  • Way and relation with OSGeo and organizer
  • Aside from offering all the support, board may think of contractual point of view
  • Question: What if nobody applies? Thoughts!
    • Can there be an online conference?
    • FOSS4G holds impact more than a conference; potential business collaboration; meeting with peers
  • Question: What about the modifications in framework to address lack of interest by LOCs?
    • Need to publicize that hosting of FOSS4G brings local economic developments
    • Need support with the digital infrastructure like PreTalks, email system, and ticketing system

OSGeo OGC MOU

  • Update/Status
  • Discussion item: how can we support OSGeo projects as reference implementations for OGC standards?
    • Need to check the exact freecharged number of reference implementations allowed by OGC to the OSGeo projects; any preference to specific projects

ESA Open Call letter of support

  • Link: https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2022-June/013058.html
  • Thoughts: It's a letter of recommendation for a company and the employees of the company are the OSGeo members.
  • It was not a question of the trust but the time required for submitting the LoR
  • The friction was due to provide openness to all the potential participants (in case of a company) to provide the time to all, as discussed and decided over the protocol (which will require voting of the board to break to protocol)
  • What will happen in case of any individual? Any predefined procedure…About updating the wiki page for Letter of Support for the individuals and action item for f2f meeting
    • Thoughts: updated profile or member page; Try to encourage their position as Charter Member

Actions

IRC Log

  • no log, a jitsi meeting

Next meeting