Difference between revisions of "IncCom Meeting14"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Agenda) |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
= Minutes = | = Minutes = | ||
+ | Full Log: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2010-03-03.log | ||
+ | Attending: Daniel Morissette, Judit Mays, Paul Spencer, Jorge Sanz, Markus Schneider, Cameron Shorter, Tyler Mitchell, Pieter De Graef, Dirk Frigne | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Minutes of [[IncCom_Meeting13|last meeting]] adopted. | ||
+ | * Considered [[Project Retiring Process]] and recommended several improvements. Cameron will call for a vote on the list once the changes are incorporated. | ||
+ | ** 7 Mar 2010: Actioned by Cameron in version 0.2: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=Project_Retiring_Process&diff=45941&oldid=32985 | ||
+ | * Considered [[Project Graduation Checklist]]. There was a failure to achieve consensus on stricter requirements for quality control and incorporation into multi-project binary distributions. | ||
+ | * Considered [http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/506 application for geomajas]. A motion was passed recommending to the board that geomajas be accepted into incubation with Paul Spencer as mentor, and Pieter De Graef as project representative. | ||
+ | * Markus Lupp has stepped down from the committee as his career has taken him in new, and unrelated directions. | ||
+ | * Some general discussion including: | ||
+ | ** whether our pending and in-incubation lists are being properly maintained (Frank agreed to work on this) | ||
+ | ** whether we have too many overlapping projects | ||
+ | ** how to judge if a project is too small/immature | ||
+ | ** possible roles for OSGeo Labs | ||
+ | ** whether we ought to be rejecting or otherwise acting on some of the old applications. | ||
+ | ** a review of the PyWPS application | ||
+ | * The meeting was closed. | ||
[[Category:Incubation]] | [[Category:Incubation]] |
Latest revision as of 01:53, 7 March 2010
Time
Proposed date: We/Th, 10/11 of March 2010.
Proposed time 19:30 UTC
Proposed location: IRC channel #osgeo (alternative Web client).
Agenda
- Approve minutes from IncCom Meeting13.
- Consider motion to approve an OSGeo Project Retiring Process
- Discuss proposed changes to Project Graduation Checklist
- Consider application for geomajas to enter incubation.
- Discuss how to address our admission backlog, and how to judge projects more consistently.
Minutes
Full Log: http://logs.qgis.org/osgeo/%23osgeo.2010-03-03.log
Attending: Daniel Morissette, Judit Mays, Paul Spencer, Jorge Sanz, Markus Schneider, Cameron Shorter, Tyler Mitchell, Pieter De Graef, Dirk Frigne
- Minutes of last meeting adopted.
- Considered Project Retiring Process and recommended several improvements. Cameron will call for a vote on the list once the changes are incorporated.
- 7 Mar 2010: Actioned by Cameron in version 0.2: http://wiki.osgeo.org/index.php?title=Project_Retiring_Process&diff=45941&oldid=32985
- Considered Project Graduation Checklist. There was a failure to achieve consensus on stricter requirements for quality control and incorporation into multi-project binary distributions.
- Considered application for geomajas. A motion was passed recommending to the board that geomajas be accepted into incubation with Paul Spencer as mentor, and Pieter De Graef as project representative.
- Markus Lupp has stepped down from the committee as his career has taken him in new, and unrelated directions.
- Some general discussion including:
- whether our pending and in-incubation lists are being properly maintained (Frank agreed to work on this)
- whether we have too many overlapping projects
- how to judge if a project is too small/immature
- possible roles for OSGeo Labs
- whether we ought to be rejecting or otherwise acting on some of the old applications.
- a review of the PyWPS application
- The meeting was closed.