Difference between revisions of "SAC Meeting 2018-01-04"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
* OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work.
 
* OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work.
−
* Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well.
+
* Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine.
 
* It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
 
* It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
  
 
## Hardware Option 1
 
## Hardware Option 1
 
## Hardware Option 2
 
## Hardware Option 2
 +
## Hosting Option: OSUOSL
 +
## Hosting Option: Other
  
 
# Others
 
# Others

Revision as of 14:33, 3 January 2018

Agenda

New Website status report

  1. Sent email to 26 wordpress accounts have no OSGeo LDAP (shared spreadsheet they can fill).
    1. Jody's answer: I got your email, with list of people that do not have a matching osgeo id. I do not have any direction, to provide - what answer are you looking for?
  2. Also told Jody he can start allowing people to edit.
  3. About LDAP: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2044
  4. Vicky: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2065
  5. Open tickets
    1. https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/query?status=!closed&component=WebSite
    2. https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/175

Sys Admin Contract

  1. Signing status report
    1. Alex: Martin's company signed and returned (Dec 27), forwarded to VP and Treasurer for OSGeo to sign (Jan 2).

Drone upgrade status (pending from last meeting)

  1. Sandro & Regina: <Fill report here>

Migration off old hard-ware

  1. Alex: Alex to propose hardware options to SAC mailing list based on https://www.siliconmechanics.com/

Virtualization, Containerization, or None

We need to decide about Virtualization and Containerization plans.

  • OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work.
  • Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine.
  • It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
    1. Hardware Option 1
    2. Hardware Option 2
    3. Hosting Option: OSUOSL
    4. Hosting Option: Other
  1. Others
    1. <Fill report here>

GeoForAll DNS

  1. Jeff & Vicky:
    1. <Fill report here>

Go over status of SSL - FOSS4G2018 has asked

  1. Jeff: <Fill report here>
    1. https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2008
    2. https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2007

GitLab Status report

  1. <Fill report here>

Motions from last meeting

https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2017-December/009088.html

Name vote
Regina +1
Sandro +1
Alex
Jeffrey +1
Markus +1

Budget

  1. <Fill report here>

Other tasks from last meeting

  1. TODO for Alex: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2062

Minutes

Attendance

TBD

FUll transcript

TBD

Details

TBD

Next Meeting

Proposed Time: UTC: Thursday, January 18th, 2018 at 8:00 pm

Retrieved from "http://wiki.osgeo.org/w/index.php?title=SAC_Meeting_2018-01-04&oldid=112367"