Difference between revisions of "SAC Meeting 2018-01-04"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 25: Line 25:
 
* It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
 
* It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
  
## Hardware Option 1
+
## [https://www.siliconmechanics.com/quotes/342695?confirmation=534586746|Hardware Option 1-3] $3000-$7500, [https://www.siliconmechanics.com/quotes/342698?confirmation=1947088835|Hardware Option 4]
## Hardware Option 2
+
### It's hard to find a dual cpu or high core count in a smaller case. So the more expensive systems could be less if we opt to not fill the drive slots. However we do need space for the foss4g archive and the downloads. So maybe a mix of SSD and Spinning...
## Hosting Option: OSUOSL
+
### Option 4 based on a mix of SSD and Spinning disks for large and fast storage. Downloads can be handled by spinning SATA.
 +
## Hosting Option: OSUOSL - VM of our choosing just like other cloud services.
 
## Hosting Option: Other
 
## Hosting Option: Other
  

Revision as of 15:50, 3 January 2018

Agenda

New Website status report

  1. Sent email to 26 wordpress accounts have no OSGeo LDAP (shared spreadsheet they can fill).
    1. Jody's answer: I got your email, with list of people that do not have a matching osgeo id. I do not have any direction, to provide - what answer are you looking for?
  2. Also told Jody he can start allowing people to edit.
  3. About LDAP: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2044
  4. Vicky: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2065
  5. Open tickets
    1. https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/query?status=!closed&component=WebSite
    2. https://github.com/OSGeo/osgeo/issues/175

Sys Admin Contract

  1. Signing status report
    1. Alex: Martin's company signed and returned (Dec 27), forwarded to VP and Treasurer for OSGeo to sign (Jan 2).

Drone upgrade status (pending from last meeting)

  1. Sandro & Regina: <Fill report here>

Migration off old hard-ware

  1. Alex: Alex to propose hardware options to SAC mailing list based on https://www.siliconmechanics.com/

Virtualization, Containerization, or None

We need to decide about Virtualization and Containerization plans.

  • OSGeo6 was made without either in part because updating 4 OS was a lot of work.
  • Hardware is somewhat dependent on the solution. Ganeti or Openstack expect lots of cheap machines (3+) to work well. Redundancy is across machines instead of within machine.
  • It should be noted in all virtualization cases we plan to use KVM with LVM based images - Ganeti/Openstack/Libvirt are a management layer on top.
    1. Option 1-3 $3000-$7500, Option 4
      1. It's hard to find a dual cpu or high core count in a smaller case. So the more expensive systems could be less if we opt to not fill the drive slots. However we do need space for the foss4g archive and the downloads. So maybe a mix of SSD and Spinning...
      2. Option 4 based on a mix of SSD and Spinning disks for large and fast storage. Downloads can be handled by spinning SATA.
    2. Hosting Option: OSUOSL - VM of our choosing just like other cloud services.
    3. Hosting Option: Other
  1. Others
    1. <Fill report here>

GeoForAll DNS

  1. Jeff & Vicky:
    1. <Fill report here>

Go over status of SSL - FOSS4G2018 has asked

  1. Jeff: <Fill report here>
    1. https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2008
    2. https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2007

GitLab Status report

  1. <Fill report here>

Motions from last meeting

https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/sac/2017-December/009088.html

Name vote
Regina +1
Sandro +1
Alex
Jeffrey +1
Markus +1

Budget

  1. <Fill report here>

Other tasks from last meeting

  1. TODO for Alex: https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/ticket/2062

Minutes

Attendance

TBD

FUll transcript

TBD

Details

TBD

Next Meeting

Proposed Time: UTC: Thursday, January 18th, 2018 at 8:00 pm