Difference between revisions of "Response to INSPIRE Metadata Draft"
Wiki-JoWalsh (talk | contribs) |
Wiki-JoWalsh (talk | contribs) m |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
* [[User:Jencek|Jan Růžička]] | * [[User:Jencek|Jan Růžička]] | ||
* [[User:Sfkeller|Stefan Keller]] | * [[User:Sfkeller|Stefan Keller]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Responses = | ||
+ | |||
+ | Note: these will be automatically re-sorted by chapter, clause etc order when they are submitted so there's no priority ordering and not much point in number ordering... |
Revision as of 13:02, 26 March 2007
- See Reading the INSPIRE Metadata Draft for preparatory material.
- See FOSS SDIC
Any member of the Free and Open Source Geospatial software community is welcome to participate in creating this response. Please add your name, and contact details on your userpage, to the list of participants and at any key stage (first stable draft; when sending the response).
Due 15.03.2007? -- Stefan 19:11, 15 March 2007 (CET)
I am sure it was the 30th, the NAP draft was due the 15th?
Right now i am trying to get the docs for the form of the response out of the JRC and change our contact dets for the SDIC. -- Jo 23-03
The deadline is definitely the 30th March, thankfully. Comments must be submitted in this Excel template: http://www.ec-gis.org/inspire/sdic_call/templates/metadataIRComments.xls
The form for each comment is:
Chapter, section or clause no. | Paragraph/Figure/Table | Type of comment | Comment justification for change) | Proposed change
So i am working on integrating Ian's and Jan's comments and reconnecting mine to chapter, verse and clause. I planned to put it all into the Excel template this evening, then i discovered that the template doesn't work properly in OpenOffice. So i'm just going to dump a pipe-delimited version of what is collated into this wiki page for others to see, and worry about getting it into the proper format later in the week :/
-- Jo 26-03
Participants
Responses
Note: these will be automatically re-sorted by chapter, clause etc order when they are submitted so there's no priority ordering and not much point in number ordering...