Difference between revisions of "Rfp-Possible-Improvements"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Add my personal comment on the idea of delegating the booth to the LOC) |
m (link to Operate OSGeo Booth and FOSS4G2013 Reflections by the LOC) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Improvements to the RFP process: | Improvements to the RFP process: | ||
| − | * not mentioned that OSGeo expects a complimentary booth in the exhibition space (Nottingham) | + | * not mentioned that OSGeo expects a complimentary booth in the exhibition space ([[FOSS4G2013 Reflections by the LOC|Nottingham]]) |
* not mentioned that the LOC needs to have an entity (such as a professional conference organising company) in place for handling the bank part of the conference organising (Portland) | * not mentioned that the LOC needs to have an entity (such as a professional conference organising company) in place for handling the bank part of the conference organising (Portland) | ||
* OSGeo should provide guidance on whether "key people" from projects should have free passes to the event, how many, and how they should be allocated | * OSGeo should provide guidance on whether "key people" from projects should have free passes to the event, how many, and how they should be allocated | ||
| − | * OSGeo should be responsible for providing marketing materials and staff for their exhibition booth (this can be delegated to the LOC where possible but the prime responsibility should be OSGeo) [''<--My comment on this is that it can't be delegated to the LOC since they are busy with a conference. Perhaps it can be delegated to adjacent Local OSGeo Chapters?''] | + | * OSGeo should be responsible for providing marketing materials and staff for their [[Operate OSGeo Booth|exhibition booth]] (this can be delegated to the LOC where possible but the prime responsibility should be OSGeo) [''<--My comment on this is that it can't be delegated to the LOC since they are busy with a conference. Perhaps it can be delegated to adjacent Local OSGeo Chapters?''] |
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [[Category: FOSS4G]] | ||
| + | [[Category: FOSS4G2013]] | ||
| + | [[Category: Events]] | ||
Revision as of 12:56, 22 November 2013
Improvements to the RFP process:
- not mentioned that OSGeo expects a complimentary booth in the exhibition space (Nottingham)
- not mentioned that the LOC needs to have an entity (such as a professional conference organising company) in place for handling the bank part of the conference organising (Portland)
- OSGeo should provide guidance on whether "key people" from projects should have free passes to the event, how many, and how they should be allocated
- OSGeo should be responsible for providing marketing materials and staff for their exhibition booth (this can be delegated to the LOC where possible but the prime responsibility should be OSGeo) [<--My comment on this is that it can't be delegated to the LOC since they are busy with a conference. Perhaps it can be delegated to adjacent Local OSGeo Chapters?]