Difference between revisions of "Face to Face Meeting Denver 2011"
(→Agenda) |
Wiki-Tschaub (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
# [[Jeff McKenna]] | # [[Jeff McKenna]] | ||
# mpg | # mpg | ||
| + | # [[Tim Schaub]] | ||
# add yourself. | # add yourself. | ||
Revision as of 10:36, 6 September 2011
Meeting
As many board members as possible (and potentially others contributing to OSGeo) are planning to meet all day September 18 in Denver after FOSS4G.
When and Where
- Post FOSS4G 2011 in Denver, 18th Sept. 2011, full day (9AM to 5PM).
- (Daniel to explain where)
- Venue should include projector, screen, wireless internet access
- Should we plan on ordering food in for lunch?
Planning to Attend
- Frank Warmerdam
- Arnulf Christl
- Jeff McKenna
- mpg
- Tim Schaub
- add yourself.
Agenda
Meeting time: 09:00 to 17:00(?)
- welcome, intros
- non-contentious business items
- review of prior finances
- revenue per quarter for the 5 years of our existence
- expenses per quarter for the 5 years of our existence
- pie-chart breakdown of where our revenue comes from (by fiscal year)
- pie-chart breakdown of where our expenses go to (by fiscal year)
- discussion of OSGeo mission, goals
- discussion of funding model, revenue sources
- executive session
- Media Sponsorship - very draft outline of idea (Tyler)
- Talk about the idea to backup Code Sprint funding in general and specifically (see mpg's mails).
- Develop a 2012 budget (see OSGeo Budget 2010)
- treasurer
- other major topics, as time permits
- Review Forward discussion items.
- Add items
Note: the "non-contentious business items" item is to quickly get out of the way any items that aren't expected to devolve existential or financial questions. If they do start to devolve into serious discussion, we should cut off debate and move them to end of meeting in hopes that the larger discussions during the day will shed light on them.
Note: as part of the mission/goals discussion, we should keep in mind topics like media sponsorship and code sprint funding as test cases. That is, have we stated our aims and intents for OSGeo such that the answers to the media sponsorship and code sprint funding questions can be readily determined? If so, then we have a good set of aims and intents.