Difference between revisions of "Geodata Committee Meeting 20060329"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
=== Geodata Hosting === | === Geodata Hosting === | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==== Hosting ==== | |
| − | + | * John Graham and Norman Vine have volunteered to provide hosting for geodata download and (possibly?) services at the San Diego Supercomputing Center. John is already hosting LandSat and Blue Marble there. | |
| − | + | * Recommended we put together a "one-stop" catalog for public geodata access. | |
| − | + | * Discussion of whether to provide download or OGC-compliant web services. Agreed we ultimately want to provide both. | |
| − | + | * List of data sets added to [[Geodata Discovery Working Group]] page. | |
| − | + | * Recommended we set up a ticket tracker or equivalent to submit URLs of geodata sources to. | |
| − | + | * Some discussion of distributed WMS tiling. Agreed that this is a thing that some of us want to work on. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==== Metadata Standards ==== | |
| − | + | * Agreed that any services or data hosted by the foundation should be discoverable with OGC protocols. | |
| − | + | * Some discussion of division of labor: metadata for the [[Geodata Discovery Working Group|Discovery group]], hosting for the [[Geodata Packaging Working Group|Packaging group]]. Debate over whether it makes sense to keep them separate or not. Agreed that the two groups can fold together if it turns out to be necessary. | |
| − | + | * Discussion of [http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/ FGDC metadata standards], and applicability outside the US. Recommended we consider FGDC compatibility. | |
| − | + | * Discussion of multiple levels or 'bars' of compatibility / usefulness. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ==== Next Actions ==== | |
| − | + | * Come up with a [[Geodata Metadata Standards|draft proposal]] for what makes OSGeo-hosted data "metadata-complete", ideally example driven. | |
| + | * Discuss with OGC people who have considered the matter closely. | ||
| + | * Also discuss with Mapdex people et al., solicit their advice, involvement. | ||
| + | * Contemplate drafting standard letters to enable scientists to free their project data ("how to convince my boss") | ||
| + | * Contemplate creating user interfaces for creating metadata, e.g. http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/geospatial-metadata-tools | ||
=== INSPIRE Directive Discussion === | === INSPIRE Directive Discussion === | ||
Revision as of 08:10, 29 March 2006
Public Geospatial Data Committee Meeting 2006-Mar-29
Meeting Info
Chair: Jo Walsh Minutes: Schuyler Erle IRC: #osgeo channel on irc.freenode.org Date: 2006-Mar-29 (at least in the Americas and Europe) Time: Wednesday March 29, 15:00 UTC
Agenda Items
Old Business
- Review minutes from last meeting
- Actions from previous meeting
- Advertise the need for working group members (volunteers?) to the main discuss list [Done]
- Proposed workgroups:
- Data Discovery / Access - Geodata Discovery Working Group
- Packaging / Reuse / QA / Maintenance - Geodata Packaging Working Group
- Data Licensing - Geodata Licensing Working Group
- Each working group will propose action items (in near future)
- Itemize old business items here please
New Items
- Open Geodata Project portal
- Create a welcome page
- Starting to put together our requests for data services on the OSGeo repository at telascience
- what data can be hosted (mirrors of OnEarth/Landsat and Blue Marble are already there
- what index/search facilities can be offered.
- what metadata schemes can be most useful
- Discussion of progress on the INSPIRE Directive on sharing environmental information within Europe and how EU-based people can help raise awareness at a national level before the final vote in the European Parliament
- Please Add Agenda Items
Minutes
Attendance
David Bitner, Daniel Brookshier, Steve Coast, Schuyler Erle, Florian Kindl, Mikel Maron, Jeff McKenna, Perry Nacionales, Markus Neteler, Daniel Putler, Norman Vine, Jo Walsh, Frank Warmerdam, John Graham
Old Business
Noted that three working groups came out of the previous meeting: geodata discovery, packaging, licensing. Participants are encouraged to sign up for the working groups. Agreed that working groups should set meeting times via the geodata@geodata.osgeo.org mailing list.
Project Portal
- Project portal lives at http://geodata.osgeo.org/, currently just a first draft. The committee votes to add a screenshot or two.
- Some discussion of whether to keep the portal page or move everything to the wiki. Agreed that we need a single clean URL to hand people. Also agreed that standards for public presentation of committees are somewhat unclear.
- Resolved that we should pile content into the project wiki page, which will then be ported into the portal's SVN next week. Jo volunteers to share SVN access with any committee member who wants to help maintain the portal site.
Geodata Hosting
Hosting
- John Graham and Norman Vine have volunteered to provide hosting for geodata download and (possibly?) services at the San Diego Supercomputing Center. John is already hosting LandSat and Blue Marble there.
- Recommended we put together a "one-stop" catalog for public geodata access.
- Discussion of whether to provide download or OGC-compliant web services. Agreed we ultimately want to provide both.
- List of data sets added to Geodata Discovery Working Group page.
- Recommended we set up a ticket tracker or equivalent to submit URLs of geodata sources to.
- Some discussion of distributed WMS tiling. Agreed that this is a thing that some of us want to work on.
Metadata Standards
- Agreed that any services or data hosted by the foundation should be discoverable with OGC protocols.
- Some discussion of division of labor: metadata for the Discovery group, hosting for the Packaging group. Debate over whether it makes sense to keep them separate or not. Agreed that the two groups can fold together if it turns out to be necessary.
- Discussion of FGDC metadata standards, and applicability outside the US. Recommended we consider FGDC compatibility.
- Discussion of multiple levels or 'bars' of compatibility / usefulness.
Next Actions
- Come up with a draft proposal for what makes OSGeo-hosted data "metadata-complete", ideally example driven.
- Discuss with OGC people who have considered the matter closely.
- Also discuss with Mapdex people et al., solicit their advice, involvement.
- Contemplate drafting standard letters to enable scientists to free their project data ("how to convince my boss")
- Contemplate creating user interfaces for creating metadata, e.g. http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/geospatial-metadata-tools