Revision as of 21:03, 22 August 2017

Meeting

Face-to-face meeting during FOSS4G 2017 in Boston.

When and Where

Monday August 14, 18:00
location: Flagship B Room at the Seaport Hotel

Attendees

Board members:

Agenda

Brief report from FOSS4G2017 LOC (important for the "future of foss4g" discussion item)
appoint meeting chair, meeting scribe/secretary
Approve f2f Paris meeting minutes?
Payment of travel expenses arrangements, refund for free registration (vote needed on the later?)
Discuss and approve pending MoUs and CLA
- approve IGU-OSGeo MoU
- approve GSDI-OSGeo MoU
- discuss DOI-OSGeo MoU (waiting for the DoI legal review)
- discuss LocationTech MoU
Vote on funding requests
- OSGeo Journal issue with FOSS4G Bonn papers: $1200 for layout and proofing
OSGeo and FOSS4G Conferences
- cost: Vasile report, discussion
- scheduling
- See also Finance_Operational_Notes#Historical_Overview (I'm not able to attend the meeting or conference but that would be my input. -Eli)
OSGeo Project Status
- Report from Maxi and Jeff, Jeff invited to present
- Project by project recommendations
- Project categories, see Comparison
System admin committee coordination - invitation extended to Alex Mandel (move as needed when Alex comes)
2017 elections
approve European local chapter

Goal

We invite board members not present at the Paris F2F Meeting to revisit their initial goals at elected representatives (to provide context for the days discussion).

The overall goal of the meeting is to coordinate two "hot topics" for the OSGeo community: event attendance costs and OSGeo project health.

We should leave this meeting with clear guidance for the subsequent board and affected committees on these two issues.

Meeting Minutes

Minutes were collected via a shared google doc, Jody acted as primary scribe to copy the notes into the wiki.

Attending: Michael, Helena, Jody, Sangee, Maria, Vasilie, Angelous (remote)
Guests: Michael Terner, Alex Mandel

Brief report from FOSS4G2017 LOC

Context: important for the "future of foss4g" discussion item.

Meeting mins were not taken for this portion, slide presentation was provided by LOC.

System admin committee coordination

Discussion on SAC functionality and challenges:

SAC short staffed - in terms of both volunteers and paid contractors
Clarification sought on how to put up bids for SAC

Subcontract the sysadmin work: - no structure to make the decisions - no time to do sysadmin work

Q: How does SAC currently function?

Board asked all committees to write down how they function last November -- write down how SAC function so that volunteers know can be clear.

Q: When was the last SAC meeting? Notes do not list this answer.

Consider asking committee should meeting once a year? Alex felt that SAC should meet more often.

System Admin Committee Challenges:

lack of time to fix things and lack of time organize meetings
Demos machine is on is last legs
- Dockers? Need contributor with expertise in this area.
machine needs to be retired
- budgeted to replace machine with wiki, track and website
do cloud hosting for some of the stuff? attract more staff, not enough expertise in the current team.

recruitment of additional people

request board help with this
seeking people with expertise in larger systems, perhaps from service providers.

Decision with website

set aside some funds in case $3000 for SAC committee - enough for employment or on-going cloud.
Action: Aex talk to jeffrey johnson and provide feedback by the end of the weekend on what is needed to host the website
Action: Jody talk to Jeffrey Johnson to explore out what cloud hosting would cost

Appoint meeting chair, scribe

chair: helena as vice president
scribe: team effort with shared google doc

Review and approve previous minuets

MOT1: Approve the Paris f2f meeting minutes

5 yes, One abstain (was not in paris meeting).
Approved

Discussion:

Was progress made on setting up the account in Europe? Not yet, need to directors to attend a bank in person.

Payment of Travel expenses

Payment of travel expenses arrangements, refund for free registration (vote needed on the later?)
- Vote not needed, travel was approved in the last meeting.

FOSS4G Europe

We had a formal request come in to form OSGeo Local chapter.

Maria has discussion about communication / competition for a european project.

Letter of support
Participation as partner on a grant would get money for doing something:
- concerned about local chapters getting in conflict with each other
Why is this a trouble for OSGeo board to decide on?
- Because foss4g europe made this as part of their goal
- A group "partnering" with osgeo-eu would be viewed as having a stronger endorsement that one partnering with osgeo-it

General discussion on the relationship between board and local chapters, other countries have not run into this issue (where country and state osgeo chapters exist).

MOT2: Recognize the formation of the osgeo european chapter.

Passed, congratulations to the new osgeo-eu local chapter!

OSGeo project status

OSGeo Project Status

Report from Maxi and Jeff, Jeff invited to present
Project by project recommendations
Project categories, see Comparison

Jeff's flight was delayed, Ask Jeff McKenna if he can present friday evening? 4:30 pm. Where: Meet down in the lobby

Action: Michael to ask Jeff Mckeena to present project status report Friday 4:30 pm

Jody speaking as incubation committee chair.

As chair I am not in a position to accept a direct order from Venka, or even the board. I can take requests to the incubation committee for review and discussion.

Discussion on use of Incubation logo on new website.

This request runs across two strategic goals
- Website is focused on outreach introducing visitors to open source geospatial software, adding an ncubation badge distracts visitors requiring them to know "insider baseball" about our foundation functions internally.
- Incubation committee is not finding the "incubation badge" motivating for projects
As chair Jody contacted each project in incubation, result is 50/50 for being upset with the change. This is significance.
- Most positive response was that projects are proud to make the commitment to be part of incubation (even if they have not had a chance to work on it).
- Note: several of our projects have not made progress since 2014 (easy to check if they have adopted graduation checklist passed in 2014)
- This is a balance between projects being annoyed and incubation committee members being frustrated with lack of progress.

Incubation committee is voting on a motion to allow projects to use incubation logo on their own websites as a link back to graduation checklist. This should meet balance the needs of incubation projects and incubation committee members.

Ask that the board wait on the incubation committee to act via the above motion.

No request was made for the marketing committee to adjust the website.

2017 elections

Update from Jeff McKenna is CRO.

charter members elections for September
board elections in October, new board in November

We reviewed the record and found the following motion from the Bonn F2F meeting adjusting the election process:

To be elcted a charter member need a nomination by a current charter member and at least one other charter member seconding the nomination.
Only veto can be rised by sending a private e-mail to the CRO that has to inform the board for an anonymous review.
If the veto is accepted by the board, then the CRO shall make it public and the charter member is not elected.

Discuss and approve pending MoUs and CLA

approve MOU_IGU
approve MOU_GSDI
discuss MOU_DOI (waiting for the DoI legal review)
discuss LocationTech MoU

MOT 3: MOU with IGU

Approved By acclimation

MOT 4: MOU with GSDI 2016

approved By acclimation

Michael Smith was able to attend the LocationTech SC prior to this meeting for a productive discussion. Two approaches were put forward:

Creating an MOU between OSGeo and LocationTech
Cross sponsoring each other allowing OSGeo to act as a participating, rather than guest, member

LocationTech MoU understanding

Would like an MOU that has some substance
- Michael will attend more OSGeo meetings, invite LocationTech Norman Vine volunteered to attend OSGeo
MOU helps to establish the communication
- Process of talking more is important, resulting MOU is less important

Action: Michael to invite Norman Vine as needed to identify meaningful areas for OSGeo and LocationTech to collaborate

Vote on funding requests

a) OSGeo Journal issue with FOSS4G Bonn papers: $1200 for layout and proofing

Apparently this was not handled, asked if possible to publish elsewhere.

Maria is contacting some of the academic contacts used for publish papers out of foss4g europe.
Previously cademic chairs volunteered to perform this function, not sure why we are being asked now.
Q: Franz Joseph is he wanting to be paid for his time, or to contract it out to someone else.
- 24 hours at 50 euro an hour
Action Venka: Ask Franz to ask in public on the board email list?
Action Helena: Ask Charlie if foss4g Bonn publication accept a few more papers?

Actions

Action: Aex talk to jeffrey johnson and provide feedback by the end of the weekend on what is needed to host the website
Action: Jody talk to Jeffrey Johnson to explore out what cloud hosting would cost
Action: Michael to ask Jeff McKenna to present project status report Friday 4:30 pm
Action: Michael to invite Norman Vine as needed to identify meaningful areas for OSGeo and LocationTech to collaborate
Action Venka: Ask Franz to ask in public on the board email list?
Action Helena: Ask Charlie if foss4g Bonn publication accept a few more papers?

Motions

MOT1: Approve previous board meeting minutes on 2017-08-14

Michael Smith
Vasile Craciunescu
Maria Brovelli
Angelos Tzotsos +
Anita Graser
Helena Mitasova
Jody Garnett
Sanghee Shin
Venkatesh Raghavan
notes...