Difference between revisions of "Infrastructure Working Group"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Line 44: Line 44:
 
* [https://www.osgeo.org/servlets/ProjectList?type=Projects OSGeo.org Subdomains] list
 
* [https://www.osgeo.org/servlets/ProjectList?type=Projects OSGeo.org Subdomains] list
  
−
 
−
=== Working Group ===
 
−
 
−
OSGeo systems (outside CollabNet) will need a system administration group of some kind.  That might be a formalized version of this working group (though this group is pretty focused on assessing needs rather than building out systems), a new committee (or working group) or possibly a working group within WebCom (taking their mandate broadly).  For the time being lets call this group the ''OSGeo System Administration Working Group''. 
 
−
 
−
It will need to consist of trusted volunteers, since they will require priveledged access to administer the systems.  Group responsibilities will include:
 
−
 
−
* Setting up OSGeo systems at Telascience.
 
−
* Providing backup and recovery capabilities. A key feature we are offering projects is ''well administered'' systems to minimize downtime and other discontinuities.
 
−
* Installing software components (ie. Plone, Confluence, Trac) used for collaberation.
 
−
* Installing software for testing and demonstration (ie. our software and dependencies).
 
−
* Installing and managing authentication services (ie. LDAP).
 
  
  

Revision as of 05:54, 1 August 2006

This is a proposal for a Working Group to assess OSGeo's software infrastructure needs and provisions.

Focus

  • Assess the OSGeo community's needs for code management and collaboration tools, particularly collecting requirements and feedback from the Incubation Committee and Website Committee
  • Offer recommendations on future development directions to the Board

Those interested in planning and running of facilities hosted at telascience - LDAP, Geodata Repository, build and test farm, demo Software Stack - should look into the System Administration Committee

Participants

Members who defected to the System Administration Committee

Meetings and discussions

  • If necessary, start a mailing list to get this off the discuss list.
  • #osgeo on irc.freenode.net for rolling discussion - if necessary, have an irc scheduled chat.

Documents

  • Infrastructure Proposal is a work-in-progress to outline what OSGeo needs to provide, both for the running of the foundation and for the software projects, in terms of online hosted services.
  • Project Infrastructure Migration is a very comprehensive overview of what tools the individual software projects are using now, both to manage their codebase and their communications.
  • Tools Spec is an attempt to write a user-oriented view of what people in different 'roles' expect to find on the site.
  • WebCom OSGeo Site Focus is a collection of site visitor use cases; when people come to the public front, what do they expect and need to find from OSGeo?
  • Geodata Repository is an overview of what metadata / archiving / redistribution facilities people have discussed wanting to offer through OSGeo
  • Software Stack is a collection of notes on what OSGeo software can be made available as a "demo stack" hosted on the telascience system.



See Also