Difference between revisions of "Infrastructure Working Group"

From OSGeo
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (→‎Documents: dead url)
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
This is a proposal for a [[Working Group]] to assess OSGeo's software infrastructure needs and provisions.
+
This is an informal Working Group established to assess OSGeo's software infrastructure needs and provisions.
 +
 
 +
'''This group is no longer active - see [[SAC]].'''
  
 
== Focus ==
 
== Focus ==
Line 5: Line 7:
 
* Assess the OSGeo community's needs for code management and collaboration tools, particularly collecting requirements and feedback from the [[Incubation Committee]] and [[Website Committee]]  
 
* Assess the OSGeo community's needs for code management and collaboration tools, particularly collecting requirements and feedback from the [[Incubation Committee]] and [[Website Committee]]  
 
* Offer recommendations on future development directions to the Board
 
* Offer recommendations on future development directions to the Board
 +
 +
Those interested in planning and running of facilities hosted at telascience - LDAP, [[Geodata Repository]], build and test farm, demo [[Software Stack]] - should look into the [[SAC|System Administration Committee]]
  
 
== Participants ==
 
== Participants ==
 
* [[User:warmerda|Frank Warmerdam]]
 
* [[User:warmerda|Frank Warmerdam]]
 
* [[User:JoWalsh|Jo Walsh]]
 
* [[User:JoWalsh|Jo Walsh]]
 +
* [[User:Tmitchell|Tyler Mitchell]] - suggested
 +
* [[User:Camerons|Cameron Shorter]] - suggested
 +
* Bob Bray - suggested
 +
 +
Members who defected to the [[SAC|System Administration Committee]]
 +
 
* [[User:SchuylerErle|Schuyler Erle]]
 
* [[User:SchuylerErle|Schuyler Erle]]
 +
* [[User:Nhv|Norman Vine]]
 +
* [[User:hobu|Howard Butler]]
 +
* [[User:Arnulf Christl|Arnulf Christl]]
 
* ''Please add yourself''
 
* ''Please add yourself''
  
 
== Meetings and discussions ==
 
== Meetings and discussions ==
  
−
* ''When there's enough to chat about, suggest a chat session time (perhaps one that works well with the existing [[Website Committee]] timings?
+
* If necessary, start a mailing list to get this off the discuss list.
−
* ''If necessary, start a mailing list''
+
* #osgeo on irc.freenode.net for rolling discussion - if necessary, have an irc scheduled chat.
  
 
== Documents ==
 
== Documents ==
 +
 +
* [[Infrastructure Proposal]] is a work-in-progress to outline what OSGeo needs to provide, both for the running of the foundation and for the software projects, in terms of online hosted services.
  
 
* [[Project Infrastructure Migration]] is a very comprehensive overview of what tools the individual software projects are using now, both to manage their codebase and their communications.
 
* [[Project Infrastructure Migration]] is a very comprehensive overview of what tools the individual software projects are using now, both to manage their codebase and their communications.
 +
 +
* [[Tools Spec]] is an attempt to write a user-oriented view of what people in different 'roles' expect to find on the site.
  
 
* [[WebCom OSGeo Site Focus]] is a collection of site visitor use cases; when people come to the public front, what do they expect and need to find from OSGeo?
 
* [[WebCom OSGeo Site Focus]] is a collection of site visitor use cases; when people come to the public front, what do they expect and need to find from OSGeo?
Line 25: Line 42:
 
* [[Geodata Repository]] is an overview of what metadata / archiving / redistribution facilities people have discussed wanting to offer through OSGeo
 
* [[Geodata Repository]] is an overview of what metadata / archiving / redistribution facilities people have discussed wanting to offer through OSGeo
  
−
== Use Cases ==
+
* [[Software Stack]] is a collection of notes on what OSGeo software can be made available as a "demo stack" hosted on the telascience system.
−
 
 
−
=== Non-software/operations Committee use case ===
 
−
 
 
−
The Geodata committee is the first attempt at moving forward on a non-software project Committee that isn't concerned with OSGeo internal operations, so we are figuring out a lot as we go along.  
 
  
−
* Wiki works well for sketching out rough requirements - e.g. [[Geodata Repository]]
+
* <strike>[https://www.osgeo.org/servlets/ProjectList?type=Projects OSGeo.org Subdomains] list</strike> (dead url)
−
* Wiki doesn't work well as a shared editing environment for pages which are destined to go onto the "Official" site - e.g. [[Geodata Homepage Draft]]
 
−
* We need some way to get multiple authors working on pages for the "official" site, without having to check them back into a live repository on subversion, or branch the pages and then re-merge them...
 
  
 
== See Also ==
 
== See Also ==
  
 +
* [https://sac.osgeo.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=sac&msgNo=23 informal survey of what FLOSS foundations generally provide as services]
 
* [[Incubation Committee]]  
 
* [[Incubation Committee]]  
−
* [[Web Committee]]
+
* [[Website Committee]]
 +
* [[System Administration Committee]]
 +
* [[Public Geospatial Data Committee]]
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Infrastructure]]

Latest revision as of 05:01, 6 July 2010

This is an informal Working Group established to assess OSGeo's software infrastructure needs and provisions.

This group is no longer active - see SAC.

Focus

  • Assess the OSGeo community's needs for code management and collaboration tools, particularly collecting requirements and feedback from the Incubation Committee and Website Committee
  • Offer recommendations on future development directions to the Board

Those interested in planning and running of facilities hosted at telascience - LDAP, Geodata Repository, build and test farm, demo Software Stack - should look into the System Administration Committee

Participants

Members who defected to the System Administration Committee

Meetings and discussions

  • If necessary, start a mailing list to get this off the discuss list.
  • #osgeo on irc.freenode.net for rolling discussion - if necessary, have an irc scheduled chat.

Documents

  • Infrastructure Proposal is a work-in-progress to outline what OSGeo needs to provide, both for the running of the foundation and for the software projects, in terms of online hosted services.
  • Project Infrastructure Migration is a very comprehensive overview of what tools the individual software projects are using now, both to manage their codebase and their communications.
  • Tools Spec is an attempt to write a user-oriented view of what people in different 'roles' expect to find on the site.
  • WebCom OSGeo Site Focus is a collection of site visitor use cases; when people come to the public front, what do they expect and need to find from OSGeo?
  • Geodata Repository is an overview of what metadata / archiving / redistribution facilities people have discussed wanting to offer through OSGeo
  • Software Stack is a collection of notes on what OSGeo software can be made available as a "demo stack" hosted on the telascience system.

See Also

Retrieved from "http://wiki.osgeo.org/w/index.php?title=Infrastructure_Working_Group&oldid=48424"